DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 72

1
SpeakEasy Pronunciation Trainer: Personalized Multimodal Pronunciation Training ...
BASE
Show details
2
SpeakEasy Pronunciation Trainer: Personalized Multimodal Pronunciation Training ...
BASE
Show details
3
Using Machine Teaching to Investigate Human Assumptions when Teaching Reinforcement Learners ...
BASE
Show details
4
What is a 'mechanism'? A distinction between two sub-types of mechanistic explanations ...
BASE
Show details
5
Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ...
BASE
Show details
6
Judgement of political statements are influenced by speaker identity ...
BASE
Show details
7
Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ...
Abstract: Iconicity refers to instances in which the form of language resembles its meaning (Perniss et al., 2010). The most prominent example in spoken language is onomatopoeia (e.g., woosh, which sounds like a gust of wind). Here we tested whether iconicity makes language more vivid by depicting the sensorimotor experiences being referred to. In Experiment 1, 44 participants read ten short passages (five iconic, five non-iconic), and then rated their vividness on several scales. These passages differed on two key words, which were either iconic (e.g., screech) or non-iconic (e.g., yell). We found no evidence that iconic language was more vivid. In Experiment 2, 199 participants each rated one longer passage that was either iconic or non-iconic (differing on eight key words). We found only marginal evidence of iconic language being more vivid, on subscales related to felt vividness. These results suggest that iconicity does not make written language more vivid. ...
Keyword: Cognitive Linguistics; Cognitive Science; Semantics; Semiotics
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.48448/tw3t-mg37
https://underline.io/lecture/26904-is-iconic-language-more-vividquestion
BASE
Hide details
8
How do the semantic properties of visual explanations guide causal inference? ...
BASE
Show details
9
Statistical properties of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) paradigm in sentence processing ...
BASE
Show details
10
Providing explanations shifts preschoolers’ metaphor preferences ...
BASE
Show details
11
Statistical properties of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) paradigm in sentence processing ...
BASE
Show details
12
Top-Down Effects on Anthropomorphism of a Robot ...
BASE
Show details
13
Hand constraint affects semantic processing of hand-manipulable objects: An fNIRS study ...
BASE
Show details
14
Verb learning in young children: Are types of comparisons important? ...
BASE
Show details
15
Hand constraint affects semantic processing of hand-manipulable objects: An fNIRS study ...
BASE
Show details
16
Verb learning in young children: Are types of comparisons important? ...
BASE
Show details
17
How do the semantic properties of visual explanations guide causal inference? ...
BASE
Show details
18
What is a 'mechanism'? A distinction between two sub-types of mechanistic explanations ...
BASE
Show details
19
A Computational Model of Comprehension in Manga Style Visual Narratives ...
BASE
Show details
20
Recovering Quantitative Models of Human Information Processing with Differentiable Architecture Search ...
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
72
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern