1 |
SpeakEasy Pronunciation Trainer: Personalized Multimodal Pronunciation Training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
SpeakEasy Pronunciation Trainer: Personalized Multimodal Pronunciation Training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Using Machine Teaching to Investigate Human Assumptions when Teaching Reinforcement Learners ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
What is a 'mechanism'? A distinction between two sub-types of mechanistic explanations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Judgement of political statements are influenced by speaker identity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Iconicity refers to instances in which the form of language resembles its meaning (Perniss et al., 2010). The most prominent example in spoken language is onomatopoeia (e.g., woosh, which sounds like a gust of wind). Here we tested whether iconicity makes language more vivid by depicting the sensorimotor experiences being referred to. In Experiment 1, 44 participants read ten short passages (five iconic, five non-iconic), and then rated their vividness on several scales. These passages differed on two key words, which were either iconic (e.g., screech) or non-iconic (e.g., yell). We found no evidence that iconic language was more vivid. In Experiment 2, 199 participants each rated one longer passage that was either iconic or non-iconic (differing on eight key words). We found only marginal evidence of iconic language being more vivid, on subscales related to felt vividness. These results suggest that iconicity does not make written language more vivid. ...
|
|
Keyword:
Cognitive Linguistics; Cognitive Science; Semantics; Semiotics
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.48448/tw3t-mg37 https://underline.io/lecture/26904-is-iconic-language-more-vividquestion
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
How do the semantic properties of visual explanations guide causal inference? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Statistical properties of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) paradigm in sentence processing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Providing explanations shifts preschoolers’ metaphor preferences ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Statistical properties of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) paradigm in sentence processing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Hand constraint affects semantic processing of hand-manipulable objects: An fNIRS study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Verb learning in young children: Are types of comparisons important? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Hand constraint affects semantic processing of hand-manipulable objects: An fNIRS study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Verb learning in young children: Are types of comparisons important? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
How do the semantic properties of visual explanations guide causal inference? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
What is a 'mechanism'? A distinction between two sub-types of mechanistic explanations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
A Computational Model of Comprehension in Manga Style Visual Narratives ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Recovering Quantitative Models of Human Information Processing with Differentiable Architecture Search ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|