DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 28

1
Translate Wisely! An Evaluation of Close and Adaptive Translation Procedures in an Experiment Involving Questionnaire Translation
In: International journal of sociology ; 51 ; 2 ; 135-162 (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Warum wir so wenig über die Sprachen in Deutschland wissen: Spracheinstellungen als Erkenntnisbarriere
In: Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research ; 16 ; 4 ; 403-419 ; Perspektiven von Kindern und Jugendlichen auf sprachliche Diversität und Sprachbildungsprozesse (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Afterword: Future Directions in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural (3MC) Survey Research
In: The essential role of language in survey research ; 243-256 (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany
In: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology ; 16 ; 1-21 (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
Multi-mode question pretesting: Using traditional cognitive interviews and online testing as complementary methods
In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field ; 1-14 ; Advancements in Online and Mobile Survey Methods (2021)
Abstract: Questionnaire development, evaluation, and pretesting research is critical for ensuring that survey questions, materials, and data collection procedures produce the highest quality data possible. Interviewer-administered cognitive interviews is a common pretesting method used to collect rich, qualitative data. As technology has advanced, researchers can conduct similar research online in self-administered modes (Behr 2016), allowing for pretesting with larger samples. Each approach has strengths and limitations that researchers can leverage to address their pretesting goals. This research presents a multi-study, iterative project using traditional and online pretesting to evaluate new confidentiality language. Study 1 used traditional cognitive interviews to collect information on respondents’ qualitative reactions to, and comprehension of, the new language, but was limited by a small sample of prior survey respondents. Study 2 used online testing to help verify the previous findings with a larger sample, but was limited to hypothetical respondent behaviour. Study 3 used online testing over two waves of data collection to evaluate actual behaviour over time and expanded on the previous two studies by using an experimental design. We discuss the utility of using multiple pretesting methods to complement each other, providing research findings that would not be possible when using one alone.
Keyword: anthropology; Antwortverhalten; cognitive interviewing; comparison of methods; Computer Methods; data capture; data quality; Datengewinnung; Datenqualität; development; Entwicklung; Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften; Fragebogen; item nonresponse; Methodenvergleich; Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis; multi-method studies; Pretest; questionnaire; response behavior; Social sciences; sociology; Sozialwissenschaften; Soziologie; Statistical Methods; survey methods; survey pretesting; web pretesting
URL: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71089
https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2020-00016
BASE
Hide details
6
Assessing the use of back translation: the shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method
In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology ; 20 ; 6 ; 573-584 (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Integration of Migrant Populations into Health Monitoring in Germany: Results from a Feasibility Study
In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field ; 1-11 ; Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Sampling of hard-to-reach survey populations (2019)
BASE
Show details
8
Language Barriers during the Fieldwork of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees in Germany
In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 75-84 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
9
The Development of a Research Programme to Translate and Test the Personal Well-being Questions in Sylheti and Urdu
In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 13-27 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
10
Surveying Immigrants: The Role of Language Attrition and Language Change in the Application of Questionnaires
In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 95-105 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
11
Linguistic and Cultural Aspects in Migrant Surveys: Introduction and Overview
In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 5-12 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
12
Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues
In: 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 108 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
13
The Place of Expert Review in Translation and Questionnaire Evaluation for Hard-to-Count Populations in National Surveys
In: Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Issues ; 19 ; GESIS-Schriftenreihe ; 29-41 ; GESIS Symposium on "Surveying the Migrant Population: Consideration of Linguistic and Cultural Aspects" (2018)
BASE
Show details
14
Translating Answers to Open-ended Survey Questions in Cross-cultural Research: A Case Study on the Interplay between Translation, Coding, and Analysis
In: Field Methods ; 27 ; 3 ; 284-299 (2018)
BASE
Show details
15
A Comparison of Two Cognitive Pretesting Techniques Supported by Eye Tracking
In: Social Science Computer Review ; 34 ; 5 ; 582-596 (2018)
BASE
Show details
16
Respondents' ratings of expressions from response scales: a two-country, two-language investigation on equivalence and translation
In: Cross-cultural survey equivalence ; 3 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 159-184 (2017)
BASE
Show details
17
Developing a low-cost technique for parallel cross-cultural instrument development: the Question Appraisal System (QAS-04)
In: Methodological aspects in cross-national research ; 11 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 31-46 (2016)
BASE
Show details
18
Text and context: challenges to comparability in survey questions
In: Methodological aspects in cross-national research ; 11 ; ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial ; 95-107 (2016)
BASE
Show details
19
Übersetzungsprobleme in der interkulturellen Befragung
In: interculture journal: Online-Zeitschrift für interkulturelle Studien ; 8 ; 10 ; 61-78 ; Probleme empirischer Kulturforschung (2015)
BASE
Show details
20
The impact of item readability on the endorsement of the midpoint response in surveys
In: Survey Research Methods ; 1 ; 2 ; 69-74 (2015)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
28
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern