| 1 |
Language identification, a tool for Corsican and for the evaluation of linguistic resources ; L'identification de langue, un outil au service du corse et de l'évaluation des ressources linguistiques
|
|
|
|
In: Traitement Automatique des Langues ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03633290 ; Traitement Automatique des Langues, 2022, Diversité Linguistique, 62 (3), pp.13-37 ; https://www.atala.org/content/diversité-linguistique-linguistic-diversity-natural-language-processing (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Machine Translation and Gender biases in video game localisation: a corpus-based analysis
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03540605 ; 2022 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Frequency, Informativity and Word Length: Insights from Typologically Diverse Corpora
|
|
|
|
In: Entropy; Volume 24; Issue 2; Pages: 280 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Text+: Language- and text-based Research Data Infrastructure ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Text+: Language- and text-based Research Data Infrastructure ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Text+: Language- and text-based Research Data Infrastructure ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
ANLIzing the Adversarial Natural Language Inference Dataset
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Control in free adjuncts: the 'dangling modifier' in English ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Loose and tight languages: A typology based on associations between constructions and lexemes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Loose and tight languages: A typology based on associations between constructions and lexemes ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Community Involvement in Research Infrastructures: The User Story Call for Text+ ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Community Involvement in Research Infrastructures: The User Story Call for Text+ ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
You’re a bitch, the stallion said: estudio contrastivo inglés-español sobre el uso sexista del lenguaje.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Control in free adjuncts: the 'dangling modifier' in English
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this dissertation, I present an account of the control of free adjuncts that relies on incremental processing. While many free adjuncts are controlled by the subject of the matrix clause (1a), this is not always the case. Some seem to be controlled by non-subject elements within the matrix clause (1b), others are apparently controlled by the discourse topic (1c), and still others involve the perceiver of the matrix clause in logophoric control (1d). These control patterns have raised the ire of many grammatical prescriptivists, who often label such constructions as ‘danglers’. (1) a. Turning the corner on his motorcycle, he saw a church. b. Turning the corner on his motorcycle, his grip began to slip. c. While under development, they put all other projects on hold. d. Turning the corner on my motorcycle, a church came into view. There have been several explanations of these patterns. Many researchers see free adjuncts as obligatorily controlled by the subject (1a) except where this is not possible, in which case logophoric control arises (1b,d). But such approaches cannot account for (1c), in which the controller is inanimate and thus incapable of perceiving anything. Other researchers regard non-subject control as the result of either an attempt to establish semantic coherence between two apparently unrelated clauses or an exhaustive search for alternative controllers based on a complex set of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic clues. These approaches predict processing difficulty whenever a mismatch occurs, but most language users process sentences like (1b-d) fairly easily. My central claim is that the patterns found in adjunct control arise because the establishment of control continues throughout the process of understanding a given sentence. The language user, on encountering a free adjunct, guesses at a suitable controller. Disruption occurs when another potential controller arrives that is at least as adequate as the current guess. I support this claim through analysis of an extensive collection of attested examples, taking care to cover the relevant syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and processing facts. I also emphasise how important it is for theoretical and descriptive studies to make specific predictions that could in principle be vindicated or falsified by future work in historical syntax or experimental psycholinguistics.
|
|
Keyword:
control; corpora; dangling modifiers; pragmatics; psycholinguistics; syntax
|
|
URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1842/37779
https://doi.org/10.7488/era/1055
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Corpora in the Classroom - the Case of the Serbian Language for Italian Speakers
|
|
Perisic Olja. - : URSS, 2021. : country:RUS, 2021. : place:Mosca, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Overview of AMALGUM – Large Silver Quality Annotations across English Genres
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Boosting English Vocabulary Knowledge through Corpus-Aided Word Formation Practice
|
|
|
|
In: RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada, ISSN 1885-9089, Vol. 20, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 49-70 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Semantic prosody and collocation: A corpus study of the near-synonyms persist and persevere
|
|
|
|
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 240-258 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
