1 |
The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions : An empirical study
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistics Vanguard ; 8 (2022), s2. - S. 239-249. - De Gruyter. - eISSN 2199-174X (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A unified analysis of polar particles in Farsi
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 5268 ; 2473-8689 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Question-sensitive discourse particles at the interfaces of syntax, semantics and pragmatics – an experimental approach
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 24 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 3 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
The most debated syntactic reflex that is typically associated with contrast is the movement of a contrastive constituent to a dedicated, left-peripheral position. For Italian and Spanish, it has been claimed that focus fronting (FF) must be sanctioned by a contrastive interpretation of the focus, while non-contrastive focus generally occurs postverbally (see, e.g., Rizzi 1997; Zubizarreta 1998; Belletti 2004; López 2009). Only sentences with a postverbal focus are thus judged as pragmatically felicitous answers to the corresponding wh-questions. Some scholars, however, have recently reported different views and data, showing that non-contrastive preverbal foci are indeed accepted by native speakers in answers to wh-questions. In this paper, I argue that a solution to this problem can be found if the binary distinction between contrastive and non-contrastive focus is abandoned, and different ‘degrees’ or ‘types’ of contrastive focus are identified, depending on the way the set of alternatives is pragmatically exploited (Krifka 2007; Cruschina 2012). I show that languages are syntactically sensitive to specific types of focus with which special operations (e.g. FF) associate. Following Bianchi, Bocci & Cruschina (2015; 2016), I then argue that FF is in fact triggered not by contrast per se, but by the conventional implicature that is associated with a specific type of focus.
|
|
Keyword:
answers to questions; contrast; conventional implicature; correction; exhaustivity; focus fronting; general linguistics; information structure; mirativity; pragmatics; syntax
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1100 https://www.glossa-journal.org/jms/article/view/1100
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
5 |
Investigating the processing of question types in contexts with different prior beliefs ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Question-sensitive discourse particles at the interfaces of syntax, semantics and pragmatics : an experimental approach
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics ; 6 (2021), 1. - 24. - Ubiquity Press. - eISSN 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Prosodia y pragmática en Tag Questions en el inglés de 4º de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
A unified account of inquisitive and assertive rising declaratives
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 951–965 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity: An investigation of English, Spanish, and Mandarin
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 572–586 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Source tags
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 354–368 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 5 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the preposition stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 4, No 1 (2019); 12 ; 2397-1835 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Intonation, yes and no
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 5 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Rhetorical questions in Papuan Malay, other Malayic Languages, and the Papuan languages of West Papua
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Or what?
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Pragmatics ; 10 (2017). - 16. - eISSN 1937-8912 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|