| 1 |
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
|
|
Ring, Nicola; Uny, Isabelle; Maxwell, Margaret; Booth, Andrew; Britten, Nicky; Flemming, Kate; Gallagher, Ian; Garside, Ruth; Hannes, Karin; Lewin, Simon; Pope, Catherine; Thomas, James; Vanstone, Meredith; France, Emma F.; Cunningham, Maggie; Duncan, Edward AS; Jepson, Ruth G; Roberts, Rachel J.; Turley, Ruth L.; Noblit, George W.; Higginbottom, Gina M. A.; Noyes, Jane. - : Wiley, 2019
|
|
Abstract:
BackgroundEvidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people’s experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research but reporting is often poor quality, and this discourages trust in, and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance isneeded to improve reporting quality.Design The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes.MethodsThe study, conducted from 2015-2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of publishedmeta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multi-disciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes.FindingsRecommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to nineteen reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance.ConclusionThe bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy and service user outcomes in healthand other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography.
|
|
Keyword:
610.7 Medical education; Guideline; meta‐ethnography; nursing; publication standards; qualitative evidence synthesis; qualitative research; RA Public aspects of medicine; reporting; research & nursing; research design
|
|
URL: https://napier-surface.worktribe.com/1294102/1/Improving%20reporting%20of%20Meta-Ethnography.
http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1294102
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13809
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography The eMERGe Reporting Guidance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
