22 |
Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
Phonologically determined asymmetries in vocabulary structure across languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Resolving ambiguity in familiar and unfamiliar casual speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Lexical retuning of children's speech perception : evidence for knowledge about words' component sounds
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Listening to REAL second language
|
|
Cutler, Anne (R12329). - : U.S., American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages, 2011
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
Perception of intrusive /r/ in English by native, cross-language and cross-dialect listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
Competition dynamics of second-language listening
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Spoken-word recognition in a nonnative language is particularly difficult where it depends on discrimination between confusable phonemes. Four experiments here examine whether this difficulty is in part due to phantom competition from “near-words” in speech. Dutch listeners confuse English /æ/ and /1/, which could lead to the sequence daf being interpreted as deaf, or lemp being interpreted as lamp. In auditory lexical decision, Dutch listeners indeed accepted such near-words as real English words more often than English listeners did. In cross-modal priming, near-words extracted from word or phrase contexts (daf from DAFfodil, lemp from eviL EMPire) induced activation of corresponding real words (deaf; lamp) for Dutch, but again not for English, listeners. Finally, by the end of untruncated carrier words containing embedded words or near-words (definite; daffodil) no activation of the real embedded forms (deaf in definite) remained for English or Dutch listeners, but activation of embedded near-words (deaf in daffodil) did still remain, for Dutch listeners only. Misinterpretation of the initial vowel here favoured the phantom competitor and disfavoured the carrier (lexically represented as containing a different vowel). Thus, near-words compete for recognition and continue competing for longer than actually embedded words; nonnative listening indeed involves phantom competition.
|
|
Keyword:
-; Dutch speakers; English language; language and languages; phonetics; speech perception; word recognition
|
|
URL: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/512471 https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.499174
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
31 |
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: a review
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0167-6393 ; EISSN: 1872-7182 ; Speech Communication ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00698858 ; Speech Communication, Elsevier : North-Holland, 2010, 52 (11-12), pp.864. ⟨10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.014⟩ (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
Casual speech processes : L1 knowledge and L2 speech perception
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
34 |
How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
35 |
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions : a review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
Vowel devoicing and the perception of spoken Japanese words
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
37 |
Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
39 |
Consonant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners : effects of local context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity : II. Syllable rhythm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|