21 |
Listeners cope with speaker and accent variation differently : evidence from the Go/No-go task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
22 |
Frequency in the input affects perception of phonological contrasts for native speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
Acoustic distance explains speaker versus accent normalization in infancy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Aero-tactile integration in fricatives : converting audio to air flow information for speech perception enhancement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Listen with your skin : Aerotak speech perception enhancement system
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Perceptual assimilation of Arabic voiceless fricatives by English monolinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
27 |
The relationship between learning to read and language-specific speech perception : maturation versus experience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Phonologically determined asymmetries in vocabulary structure across languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
Resolving ambiguity in familiar and unfamiliar casual speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
Language experience modulates weighting of acoustic cues for vowel perception : an event-related potential study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Now you see it, now you don't : frequency distribution of articulatory information reflected in speech face motion
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
34 |
Metrical rhythm in speech planning : priming or predictability
|
|
Shaw, Jason (R16227). - : Adelaide, S. Aust., Causal Productions, 2012
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
Lexical retuning of children's speech perception : evidence for knowledge about words' component sounds
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
37 |
The intelligibility of Lombard speech : communicative setting matters
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Recently we reported that talkers modified their speech production strategies in noise as a function of whether their interlocutor could or could not be seen, i.e. face-to-face (FTF) or non-visual conditions (NV). Participants made greater auditory speech modifications (e.g. in terms of amplitude and FO) in NV condition, and greater visual speech modifications (in terms of inter-lip area) in FTF condition [1]. The current study examined whether such modifications led to corresponding differences in speech intelligibility in the different settings. In the current experiment, participants were presented with a set of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) phonemes in noise at a fixed SNR in auditory-only, visual-only and auditory-visual conditions. The CVC stimuli were drawn from speech recordings in quiet and in noise conditions, and also during NV and FTF conditions from [1]. The results showed that the speech in noise tokens produced in the FTF conditions had a greater AV benefit than for tokens produced in the NV conditions. Also, the AV benefit was greater for speech tokens produced in noise than for speech produced in quiet. The results were discussed in terms of efficient talker and listener strategies.
|
|
Keyword:
170112 - Sensory Processes; 970120 - Expanding Knowledge in Languages; auditory perception; Communication and Culture; Lombard speech; noise; Perception and Performance; speech perception
|
|
URL: http://interspeech2012.org/ http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/521190
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
39 |
Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception : Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
Can litheners retune native categories acroth a thoneme boundary?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|