| 21 |
一位以英語為母語之英語教師在台灣國小課堂中使用提問策略之個案研究 ; A Case Study on a Native English-speaking Teacher’s Questioning Strategies in an Elementary School in Taiwan
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 22 |
Swedish and German Rejecting Questions
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Diese Arbeit untersucht eine Klasse von tendenziösen Fragen, die mindestens im Schwedischen und Deutschen existieren: Rejecting Questions (RQs). RQs unterscheiden sich von anderen Fragen mit deklarativer Syntax u.a. darin, dass die kontextuelle Evidenz, die solche Fragen lizensiert, von umgekehrter Polarität (relativ zur Polarität der Frage selber) ist - positive RQs benötigen Evidenz für eine negierte Proposition, positive deklarative Fragen benötigen Evidenz für eine positive Proposition. In drei Experimenten wird gezeigt, dass i) schwedische negative RQs sich in ihren Lizensierungsbedingungen von negativen deklarativen Fragen unterscheiden, ii) schwedische negative RQs sich in ihrer Intonation von Zurückweisungen unterscheiden, iii) schwedische und deutsche RQs tendenziell unmarkierter zu sein scheinen, wenn sie Negation enthalten. Das dritte Experiment liefert außerdem einen Beitrag zur Analyse der Bedeutung der schwedischen Modalpartikel väl. Ich argumentiere, dass RQs sprecherindizierte Präferenzen für einen eingebetteten Sprechakt ausdrücken. Dieser eingebettete Sprechakt unterscheidet sich im unmarkierten Fall zwischen negativen RQs, welche i.d.R. hypothetische Zurückweisungen sind, und positiven RQs, welche immer hypothetische Assertionen sind. Mit dieser Asymmetrie erkläre ich die Auffälligkeiten in den Lizensierungsbedingungen von RQs, die sowohl im Schwedischen als auch im Deutschen nachgewiesen werden können. ; This thesis investigates a class of biased questions that exists at least in Swedish and German: rejecting questions (RQs). RQs differ from other questions with declarative syntax i.a. in that the contextual evidence that licenses such questions is of the opposite polarity relative to the polarity of the question itself - positive RQs require evidence for a negated proposition; positive declarative questions require evidence for a positive proposition. The results of three experiments show that i) Swedish negative RQs differ in their licensing conditions from negative declarative questions, ii) Swedish negative RQs differ in their intonation from rejections, iii) Swedish and German RQs tend to be less marked if they contain negation. The third experiment also contributes to the analysis of the meaning of the Swedish modal particle väl. I argue that RQs express speaker-indexed preferences for embedded speech acts. In the unmarked case, this embedded speech act differs between negative RQs, which are usually hypothetical rejections, and positive RQs, which are always hypothetical assertions. By way of this asymmetry, I explain the peculiarities in the licensing conditions of RQs that can be shown to exist both in Swedish and German.
|
|
Keyword:
410 Linguistik; ddc:410; Fragen; GC 7287; GW 1082; modal particles; Modalpartikeln; Negation; pragmatics; Pragmatik; question bias; questions; semantics; Semantik; Tendenz von Fragen
|
|
URN:
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/20469-2
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.18452/19686
http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/20469
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 23 |
Phrasing Is Key: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Georgian
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 24 |
Prosody and Word Order : Prominence Marking in Declaratives and Wh-questions in Urdu/Hindi
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 25 |
Questions, biases and ‘negation’: evidence from Scots varieties
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 27 |
Quantificational DP arguments of opaque predicates in German
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 28 |
Multiform Arguments in the Historiography of Individualism in Pre-Modern Europe
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 29 |
Why make sense of silence? The clausal syntax of a reduced why-question
|
|
|
|
In: Zaitsu, Anissa. (2018). Why make sense of silence? The clausal syntax of a reduced why-question. UC Santa Cruz: Linguistics. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8874c3kh (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 30 |
An Exploration of Parliamentary Speeches in the Irish Parliament Using Topic Modeling
|
|
|
|
In: Dissertations (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 31 |
Rhetorical questions in Papuan Malay, other Malayic Languages, and the Papuan languages of West Papua
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 33 |
Basque-Spanish Language Contact : an empirical study on word order in interrogatives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 34 |
Effects of Interspersing Recall versus Recognition Questions with Response Cards During Lectures on Students' Academic and Participation Behaviors in a College Classroom
|
|
|
|
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 35 |
Intervention effects in non-local dependencies: evidence from Persian
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 36 |
Perguntas QU-, orações subordinadas e ordem de palavras em Karitiana ; WH- questions, embedded clauses, and word order in Karitiana
|
|
Vivanco, Karin Camolese. - : Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP, 2018. : Universidade de São Paulo, 2018. : Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 37 |
“Pra quê tanta pergunta?” : reflexões sobre perguntas de compreensão e interpretação de texto
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 38 |
Ontology Based Framework for Conceptualizing Human Affective States and Their Influences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 39 |
Heads and Adjuncts: an experimental study of subextraction from participials and coordination in English, German and Norwegian ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 40 |
Heads and Adjuncts: an experimental study of subextraction from participials and coordination in English, German and Norwegian
|
|
Brown, Jessica M. M.. - : University of Cambridge, 2017. : Modern and Medieval Languages, 2017. : Trinity Hall, 2017
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
