| 1 |
Contextual time-continuous emotion recognition based on multimodal data ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Peer Interactions in Academic Contexts for Adolescents with Disabilities ...
|
|
: University of Virginia, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Cortical basis of vocalization in behaving freely moving minipigs ; Bases corticales de la vocalisation chez le miniporc en comportement
|
|
|
|
In: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03353386 ; Neuroscience. Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-.], 2021. English. ⟨NNT : 2021GRALS013⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
De la méthodologie expérimentale à la recherche interventionniste. Contribution à une approche socio-anthropologique de l'école et de la société inclusives [Volume 1. Note de synthèse]
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/tel-03207179 ; Education. Université de La Réunion, 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Perspectives of interventions in applied linguistics: which responses to societal needs ; Perspectives d’interventions en linguistique appliquée : quelles réponses face aux besoins sociétaux
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0071-190X ; EISSN: 1965-0477 ; Études de linguistique appliquée : revue de didactologie des langues-cultures ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03193545 ; Études de linguistique appliquée : revue de didactologie des langues-cultures, 202 (2021/2), pp.133-258, 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
動機、老師的即時行為及課堂互動影響學習者溝通意願之研究 ; The Effects of Learners' Motivation, Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, and Class Interactions on Their Willingness to Communicate
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Quantification of Mutual Understanding in Task-Based Human-Human Interactions
|
|
Reverdy, Justine. - : Trinity College Dublin. School of Computer Science & Statistics. Discipline of Computer Science, 2021
|
|
Abstract:
APPROVED ; This thesis explores the quantification of mutual understanding in task-based interactions by observing the relation between patterns of repetitions and measures of communicative success. Two important characteristics of mutual understanding have to be kept in mind: it cannot be established for certainty and cannot be directly measured. However, signs of understanding can be detected and quantified, based on two elements: (1) the way by which conversational partners achieve understanding is dependent on their communicative behaviour, and (2) dialogues exhibit repetitions, despite the immense number of possibilities to compose sentences with words that are at our disposal. These repetitions of linguistic choices between conversational partners, a process known as alignment, are argued to play an important role in the establishment of a common ground that leads to understanding. The exact dynamic of alignment ? and related phenomena such as synchrony ? is still under debate, which has created a large body of research interested in determining its scope. However, fewer studies have been conducted that systematically examine its relation with communicative success, and even fewer studies do it in an automatic way that does not require human annotations. It is in this perspective that the research presented here compares repetition patterns to different communicative assessment methods, namely task-success scores, presence of high levels of negative/positive cognitive states, and third-party moderator evaluation. Five corpora with a total of 192 dialogues (about 32 hours) are analysed in terms of other-shared and self-shared repetitions, at different levels of linguistic representations and utterance lengths. The main contribution of this thesis is the establishment of the extent to which repetitions ? categorised as happening outside chance variation ? may function as a proxy measure of mutual understanding. Results suggest a higher proportion of other than self -repetitions happening above chance in task-based interactions. While participants in the position of information givers have a higher volume of speech and use longer utterances, information followers repeat the giver and themselves more. Information givers repeating themselves seem to relate to higher task success, even more so when repeating themselves structurally, in particular for women. Furthermore, familiarity emerged as a decisive factor for success. Participants being familiar with each other unsurprisingly achieved better scores whether they exhibited signs of linguistic alignment or not, however, unfamiliar partners seemed to benefit from alignment, in particular at first attempt of a task. In computer-mediated interactions, both other and self repetitions happened in high proportions, and a significant drop in self -repetitions of long utterances was observed in troublesome dialogues; in interactions monitored by a human facilitator, more encouragements were provided where the method detected less alignment and inversely less encouragement when alignment was present. These two findings highlight the potential of (1) detection of problematic communication, (2) indication of the state of an interaction ? mutual understanding taking place or not, of the described method. It was also found that American speakers repeat themselves more than Scottish speakers. However, in both dialects, familiar participants did not need to exhibit alignment to succeed in the task. Finally, divergence ? taken as the opposite behaviour of alignment ? was very seldom exhibited in the task-based corpora analysed. Altogether, the proxy measure of mutual understanding described in this document stress that the research efforts made in this direction have a great potential both for the improvement of dialogue systems and monitoring critical human interactions.
|
|
Keyword:
Alignment; Computational Linguistics; Computer Science; Interactions; Mutual Understanding; Natural Language Processing; Repetition
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/95983
https://tcdlocalportal.tcd.ie/pls/EnterApex/f?p=800:71:0::::P71_USERNAME:REVERDYJ
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Collaborative problem solving in higher education classrooms: Exploring student interactions, group progress, and the role of the teacher
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
From user-generated text to insight context-aware measurement of social impacts and interactions using natural language processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Questions as a tool for cross-comprehension in work meetings ; La question comme outil de construction de l’intercompréhension en réunion de travail
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-03153385 ; Linguistique. Université de Lorraine, 2020. Français. ⟨NNT : 2020LORR0233⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Interactions in Romance languages: multimodal studies ; Les interactions en langues romanes : études multimodales ; Le interazioni in lingue romanze: studi multimodali
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1023-2044 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02987600 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée, pp.1-181, 2020 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Multidimensional analysis of french discourse markers beginning with "si" ; Analyse multidimensionnelle des marqueurs discursifs commençant par "si"
|
|
|
|
In: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03220573 ; Linguistique. Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, 2020. Français. ⟨NNT : 2020UPHF0028⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Trayectorias de identidad acadèmica en el contexto del Trabajo por proyectos:: un estudio de caso
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Comprendre la situation d’interaction entre des personnes vivant avec de l’aphasie et les interlocuteurs non-familiers de leur communauté
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Emoción, percepción, producción: un estudio psicolingüístico para detectar emociones en el habla
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Sociolinguistique des interactions verbales et exploitations didactiques
|
|
|
|
In: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03231366 ; Linguistique. Université Lumière Lyon 2, 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Relations, tensions et interactions verbales. De la régulation à la rupture
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03008623 ; Linguistique. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Apprentissage des langues et numérique : contextualisations, interactions et immersions
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02146465 ; Linguistique. Université de Lorraine (Nancy), 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
