1 |
Reading collocations in an L2: do collocation processing benefits extend to non-adjacent collocations?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?: the effects of frequency and amount of exposure
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The PHaVE List: a pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: issues with guessing and sampling rates
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Jumping from the highest graded readers to ungraded novels: Four case studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Jumping from the highest graded readers to ungraded novels: four case studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: what the research shows
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension: The Same or Different from Reading Comprehension?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension: The Same or Different from Reading Comprehension?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
A Phrasal Expressions List
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
There is little dispute that formulaic sequences form an important part of the lexicon, but to date there has been no principled way to prioritize the inclusion of such items in pedagogic materials, such as ESL/EFL textbooks or tests of vocabulary knowledge. While wordlists have been used for decades, they have only provided information about individual word forms (e.g. the General Service List (West 1953) and the Academic Word List (Coxhead 2000)). This article addresses this deficiency by presenting the PHRAS al E xpressions List ( PHRASE List ), a list of the 505 most frequent non-transparent multiword expressions in English, intended especially for receptive use. The rationale and development of the list are discussed, as well as its compatibility with British National Corpus single-word frequency lists. It is hoped that the PHRASE List will provide a basis for the systematic integration of multiword lexical items into teaching materials, vocabulary tests, and learning syllabuses.
|
|
Keyword:
Articles
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams010 http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/299
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|