1 |
Dependency locality as an explanatory principle for word order
|
|
|
|
In: Prof. Levy (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Hierarchical Representation in Neural Language Models: Suppression and Recovery of Expectations
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Cognitive Science Honors the Memory of Jeffrey Elman
|
|
|
|
In: MIT Press (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
SyntaxGym: An Online Platform for Targeted Evaluation of Language Models
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Neural language models as psycholinguistic subjects: Representations of syntactic state
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
We investigate the extent to which the behavior of neural network language models reflects incremental representations of syntactic state. To do so, we employ experimental methodologies which were originally developed in the field of psycholinguistics to study syntactic representation in the human mind. We examine neural network model behavior on sets of artificial sentences containing a variety of syntactically complex structures. These sentences not only test whether the networks have a representation of syntactic state, they also reveal the specific lexical cues that networks use to update these states. We test four models: Two publicly available LSTM sequence models of English (Jozefowicz et al., 2016; Gulordava et al., 2018) trained on large datasets; an RNN Grammar (Dyer et al., 2016) trained on a small, parsed dataset; and an LSTM trained on the same small corpus as the RNNG. We find evidence for basic syntactic state representations in all models, but only the models trained on large datasets are sensitive to subtle lexical cues signalling changes in syntactic state.
|
|
URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130543
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
Structural Supervision Improves Learning of Non-Local Grammatical Dependencies
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
|
|
|
|
In: Other repository (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Child-directed Listening: How Caregiver Inference Enables Children's Early Verbal Communication.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
|
|
|
|
In: Prof. Fedorenko (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Pronoun interpretation in Mandarin Chinese follows principles of Bayesian inference
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Assessing Language Proficiency from Eye Movements in Reading
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections
|
|
|
|
In: Sage (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Language Learning and Processing in People and Machines
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Lossy‐Context Surprisal: An Information‐Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing
|
|
|
|
In: Wiley (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A Rate–Distortion view of human pragmatic reasoning
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections
|
|
|
|
In: Psychol Sci (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Lossy‐Context Surprisal: An Information‐Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|