1 |
PERSONALITY FACTORS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: INHIBITION, ANXIETY AND RISK –TAKING ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
PERSONALITY FACTORS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: INHIBITION, ANXIETY AND RISK –TAKING ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
How Cognitive Abilities May Support Children’s Bilingual Literacy Development in a Multilingual Society ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Cumulative Effects of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Measures on Algae Growth Inhibition
|
|
|
|
In: Water; Volume 14; Issue 6; Pages: 877 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
How Cognitive Abilities May Support Children’s Bilingual Literacy Development in a Multilingual Society
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 33 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Nonverbal Switching Ability of Monolingual and Bilingual Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 2; Pages: 108 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Altered Inhibitory Mechanisms in Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence From Lexical Decision and Simple Reaction Time Tasks
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1662-5161 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03236439 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Frontiers, 2021, 15, ⟨10.3389/fnhum.2021.624026⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Controlling Two Languages: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Immersion in Second-Language Learning
|
|
|
|
In: Challenger, vol 2, iss 3 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Protocol for a scoping review of research practices in the investigation of bilingual effects on inhibition and attentional function in adolescents ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Exploring Neural Signal Complexity as a Potential Link between Creative Thinking, Intelligence, and Cognitive Control
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Intelligence; Volume 9; Issue 4; Pages: 59 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Returning to the Effects of Inhibition of Return on Lexical Decisions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Intervención en el control inhibitorio en niños con y sin trastorno de lenguaje dentro del aula
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Bilinguals’ inhibitory control and attentional processes in a visual perceptual task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Multimodal semantic revision during inferential processing: The role of inhibitory control in text and picture comprehension. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Individual Learning Phenotypes Drive Collective Behavior
|
|
|
|
In: Biological Sciences Faculty Research and Publications (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Individual differences in learning can influence how animals respond to and communicate about their environment, which may nonlinearly shape how a social group accomplishes a collective task. There are few empirical examples of how differences in collective dynamics emerge from variation among individuals in cognition. Here, we use a naturally variable and heritable learning behavior called latent inhibition (LI) to show that interactions among individuals that differ in this cognitive ability drive collective foraging behavior in honey bee colonies. We artificially selected two distinct phenotypes: high-LI bees that ignore previously familiar stimuli in favor of novel ones and low-LI bees that learn familiar and novel stimuli equally well. We then provided colonies differentially composed of different ratios of these phenotypes with a choice between familiar and novel feeders. Colonies of predominantly high-LI individuals preferred to visit familiar food locations, while low-LI colonies visited novel and familiar food locations equally. Interestingly, in colonies of mixed learning phenotypes, the low-LI individuals showed a preference to visiting familiar feeders, which contrasts with their behavior when in a uniform low-LI group. We show that the shift in feeder preference of low-LI bees is driven by foragers of the high-LI phenotype dancing more intensely and attracting more followers. Our results reveal that cognitive abilities of individuals and their social interactions, which we argue relate to differences in attention, drive emergent collective outcomes.
|
|
Keyword:
Biology; cognition; collective behavior; honey bee; latent inhibition; learning
|
|
URL: https://epublications.marquette.edu/bio_fac/815 https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1817&context=bio_fac
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|