1 |
Micropoetry meets Neurocognitive Poetics ... : Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights ... : An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
What is the Difference? ... : Rereading Shakespeare’s Sonnets — an Eye Tracking Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights: An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare’s Sonnets —An Eye Tracking Study
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Texts are often reread in everyday life, but most studies of rereading have been based on expository texts, not on literary ones such as poems, though literary texts may be reread more often than others. To correct this bias, the present study is based on two of Shakespeare’s sonnets. Eye movements were recorded, as participants read a sonnet then read it again after a few minutes. After each reading, comprehension and appreciation were measured with the help of a questionnaire. In general, compared to the first reading, rereading improved the fluency of reading (shorter total reading times, shorter regression times, and lower fixation probability) and the depth of comprehension. Contrary to the other rereading studies using literary texts, no increase in appreciation was apparent. Moreover, results from a predictive modeling analysis showed that readers’ eye movements were determined by the same critical psycholinguistic features throughout the two sessions. Apparently, even in the case of poetry, the eye movement control in reading is determined mainly by surface features of the text, unaffected by repetition.
|
|
Keyword:
Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00421 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113389/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
Reading Shakespeare sonnets ... : Combining quantitative narrative analysis and predictive modeling - an eye tracking study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling —an Eye Tracking Study
|
|
|
|
In: J Eye Mov Res (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The emotion potential of simple sentences ... : additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates. Is a door that is not open mentally closed?
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Pragmatics (JoP) 38 (2006) 7, 1033-1050
|
|
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
|
|
|
|