1 |
The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers
|
|
|
|
In: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Music is similar to language in terms of working memory interference
|
|
|
|
In: Psychon Bull Rev (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner's 40 year legacy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Semantic and Plausibility Preview Benefit Effects in English: Evidence from Eye Movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Task Effects Reveal Cognitive Flexibility Responding to Frequency and Predictability: Evidence from Eye Movements in Reading and Proofreading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence from Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Parallel Object Activation and Attentional Gating of Information: Evidence from Eye Movements in the Multiple Object Naming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Do we access information from any object we can see, or do we only access information from objects that we intend to name? In three experiments using a modified multiple object naming paradigm, subjects were required to name several objects in succession when previews appeared briefly and simultaneously in the same location as the target as well as at another location. In Experiment 1, preview benefit—faster processing of the target when the preview was related (a mirror image of the target) compared to unrelated (semantically and phonologically)—was found for the preview in the target location but not a location that was never to be named. In Experiment 2, preview benefit was found if a related preview appeared in either the target location or the third-to-be-named location. Experiment 3 showed the difference between results from the first two experiments was not due to the number of objects on the screen. These data suggest that attention serves to gate visual input about objects based on the intention to name them, and that information from one intended-to-be-named object can facilitate processing of an object in another location.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028646 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3670605 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22612163
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|