2 |
SOME PERSPECTIVE DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVING MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
SOME PERSPECTIVE DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVING MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
On Glasses Half Full or Half Empty. Understanding Framing Effects in Terms of Default Implicatures
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Complex Signals: Reflexivity, Hierarchical Structure, and Modular Composition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The role of disciplinary perspectives in an epistemology of scientific models
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Machines will think: structure and interpretation of Alan Turing’s imitation game
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Epistemic diversity and the question of Lingua Franca in science and philosophy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
An Examination of Some Aspects of Howard Stein's Work
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Some understand Stein’s “Yes, but…” as an entry in the realism—instrumentalism debate (RID) itself, albeit one dissatisfied with then-extant positions. In this paper, however, I argue the opposite: Stein’s conception of science and his approach to its history and philosophy actually preclude the RID. First, I characterize Stein as persistently attending to his own historical and philosophical methods. I then describe his conception of science as both a dialectic and an enterprise, and I draw from this conception several conclusions about the relations between science and its history and philosophy. Finally, I provide a reading of “Yes, but…” that follows from Stein’s conception of science. On this reading, the RID is either irrelevant to or wrong of science and, moreover, distracts from a legitimate inquiry. I conclude by interpreting Stein’s remark that there is ``no difference that makes a difference’’ between a cogent and enlightened realism and a sophisticated instrumentalism.
|
|
Keyword:
History of Philosophy of Science; Realism/Anti-realism
|
|
URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15926/ http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15926/1/An%20Examination%20of%20Some%20Aspects%20of%20Howard%20Stein%27s%20Work.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|