DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...168
Hits 1 – 20 of 3.345

1
Multiagent Dynamics of Gradual Argumentation Semantics
In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03584238 ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022), May 2022, Auckland (virtual), New Zealand (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Multiagent Dynamics of Gradual Argumentation Semantics
In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03584238 ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022), May 2022, Auckland (virtual), New Zealand (2022)
BASE
Show details
3
PROTECT: A Pipeline for Propaganda Detection and Classification
In: CLiC-it 2021- Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03417019 ; CLiC-it 2021- Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Jan 2022, Milan, Italy (2022)
BASE
Show details
4
Towards Parallel Algorithms for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ...
Hofer, Mathias. - : TU Wien, 2022
BASE
Show details
5
Arguing About “COVID” ; Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts as a “COVID-19 Death”
Lewiński, Marcin; Abreu, Pedro. - : Springer, 2022
BASE
Show details
6
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy ; Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments
Abstract: PTDC/FER-FIL/28278/2017 EXPL/FER-FIL/0276/2021 UIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020 ; The fallacy of ignoring qualifications, or secundum quid et simpliciter, is a deceptive strategy that is pervasive in argumentative dialogues, discourses, and discussions. It consists in misrepresenting an utterance so that its meaning is broadened, narrowed, or simply modified to pursue different goals, such as drawing a specific conclusion, attacking the interlocutor, or generating humorous reactions. The “secundum quid” was described by Aristotle as an interpretative manipulative strategy, based on the contrast between the “proper” sense of a statement and its meaning taken absolutely or in a certain respect. However, how can an “unqualified” statement have a proper meaning different from the qualified one, and vice versa? This “linguistic” fallacy brings to light a complex relationship between pragmatics, argumentation, and interpretation. The secundum quid is described in this paper as a manipulative argument, whose deceptive effect lies in its pragmatic dimension. This fallacy is analyzed as a strategy of decontextualization lying at the interface between pragmatics and argumentation and consisting of the unwarranted passage from an utterance to its semantic representation. By ignoring the available evidence and the presumptive interpretation of a statement, the speaker places it in a different context or suppresses textual and contextual evidence to infer a specific meaning different from the presumable one. ; publishersversion ; published
Keyword: Argumentation; Decontextualization; Enrichment; Fallacy; Ignoring qualifications; Language and Linguistics; Linguistics and Language; Manipulation; Pragmatics
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/135523
https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010013
BASE
Hide details
7
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
BASE
Show details
8
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
BASE
Show details
9
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
BASE
Show details
10
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy: Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 13 (2022)
BASE
Show details
11
More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 59 (2022)
BASE
Show details
12
Questions in argumentative dialogue
In: Journal of Pragmatics ; 188 (2022). - S. 56-79. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0378-2166. - eISSN 1879-1387 (2022)
BASE
Show details
13
“I want you to defend that!” The Argumentative Structure of U.S.A. Presidential Debates
In: Doctoral Dissertations (2022)
BASE
Show details
14
Inferring Inferences: Relational Propositions for Argument Mining
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2022)
BASE
Show details
15
Discourse Processes between Reason and Emotion
Anesa, Patrizia; Fragonara, Aurora. - : HAL CCSD, 2021. : Palgrave Macmillan, 2021
In: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03470338 ; Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, 978-3-030-70091-1. ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-70091-1⟩ ; https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-70091-1#about (2021)
BASE
Show details
16
Nom collectif, syntagme défini pluriel : enjeux sémantiques et argumentatifs de la référence plurielle
In: Colloque Langue et Discours 2021 La référence : (co-)construction et exploitation ; https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03286579 ; Colloque Langue et Discours 2021 La référence : (co-)construction et exploitation, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Mar 2021, Grenoble, France ; https://led2021.sciencesconf.org/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
17
La théorie de la polyphonie et des stéréotypes au service de l’analyse contrastive des opérateurs discursifs
In: ISSN: 1699-4949 ; Çédille, revista de estudios franceses ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03225729 ; Çédille, revista de estudios franceses, Elsevier Scopus, 2021, pp.541-573 ; https://www.ull.es/revistas/index.php/cedille/article/view/1928/1658 (2021)
BASE
Show details
18
L’argumentation, entre langue et texte
In: Énonciation et Argumentation ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03372621 ; Énonciation et Argumentation, Université de Passo Fundo; Université Fédérale de Santa Catarina; Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Oct 2021, Paris, France (2021)
BASE
Show details
19
Irony, pretense and the divided ethos ; La feintise de l’ironiste ou l’ethos désaccordé
In: (Dés)accords. À la recherche de la différence propice. ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03282370 ; Basso Pier Luigi. (Dés)accords. À la recherche de la différence propice., 2021, Actes du Congrès de l'AFS 2019, ISBN : 979-10-95835-02-8 ; http://afsemio.fr/publications/actes_congres/ (2021)
BASE
Show details
20
#publicitésociétale: quand le numérique devient un outil de sensibilisation
In: ISSN: 1023-2044 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03502387 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée, Neuchâtel : Institut de linguistique de l'Université, 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...168

Catalogues
495
123
617
0
8
4
39
Bibliographies
2.061
4
0
0
67
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
38
11
0
0
Open access documents
928
2
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern