4 |
Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception: A case study of Malayalam and English voicing
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 73 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
|
|
|
|
In: Psychon Bull Rev (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Interleaved lexical and audiovisual information can retune phoneme boundaries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Neural correlates of phonetic adaptation as induced by lexical and audiovisual context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Universals of listening : equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Vocabulary structure affects word recognition : evidence from German listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception : a case study of Malayalam and English voicing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Interleaved lexical and audiovisual information can retune phoneme boundaries ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The Processing of Linguistic Prominence ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Prominence, the expression of informational weight within utterances, can be signaled by prosodic highlighting ( head-prominence , as in English) or by position (as in Korean edge-prominence ). Prominence confers processing advantages, even if conveyed only by discourse manipulations. Here we compared processing of prominence in English and Korean, using a task that indexes processing success, namely recognition memory. In each language, participants’ memory was tested for target words heard in sentences in which they were prominent due to prosody, position, both or neither. Prominence produced recall advantage, but the relative effects differed across language. For Korean listeners the positional advantage was greater, but for English listeners prosodic and syntactic prominence had equivalent and additive effects. In a further experiment semantic and phonological foils tested depth of processing of the recall targets. Both foil types were correctly rejected, suggesting that semantic processing had not ...
|
|
Keyword:
200199 Communication and Media Studies not elsewhere classified; 200399 Language Studies not elsewhere classified; Education; FOS Languages and literature; FOS Media and communications; FOS Sociology; Sociology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4706984 https://sage.figshare.com/collections/The_Processing_of_Linguistic_Prominence/4706984
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
KemberEtAl-SuppInfo-SecondRevision – Supplemental material for The Processing of Linguistic Prominence ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
KemberEtAl-SuppInfo-SecondRevision – Supplemental material for The Processing of Linguistic Prominence ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
The dynamics of lexical activation and competition in bilinguals' first versus second language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|