| 1 |
The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1868-6346 ; EISSN: 1868-6354 ; Journal of Laboratory Phonology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03127373 ; Journal of Laboratory Phonology , Ubiquity Press, 2020, 11 (1), ⟨10.5334/labphon.195⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 11, No 1 (2020); 1 ; 1868-6354 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Analyzing speech in both time and space: Generalized additive mixed models can uncover systematic patterns of variation in vocal tract shape in real-time MRI
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 11, No 1 (2020); 2 ; 1868-6354 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Analyzing speech in both time and space : generalized additive mixed models can uncover systematic patterns of variation in vocal tract shape in real-time MRI
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Introducing abstraction, diversity, and speech dynamics
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 10, No 1 (2019); 12 ; 1868-6354 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
What native language can and cannot do: Perception of onset consonant clusters
|
|
|
|
In: Abstraction, Diversity, and Speech Dynamics ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01735074 ; Abstraction, Diversity, and Speech Dynamics, May 2017, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Articulatory and Acoustic Characteristics of German Fricative Clusters
|
|
|
|
In: Phonetica (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Functional linear mixed models for irregularly or sparsely sampled data
|
|
|
|
In: Statistical Modelling (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Functional Linear Mixed Models for Irregularly or Sparsely Sampled Data ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Prosodic constituent structure and anticipatory pharyngealisation in Libyan Arabic
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This study examines anticipatory pharyngealisation (i.e., emphasis) in Libyan Arabic, across a hierarchy of prosodic boundary levels (syllable vs. word vs. phonological phrase vs. intonation phrase ‘IP’) in order to quantify the magnitude, and identify the planned domain of anticipatory pharyngealisation. The acoustic manifestation of pharyngealisation is lowering in the second formant (F2) in pharyngealised contexts compared to their plain cognates. To investigate speech production models of how pharyngealisation is anticipated in advance, F2 measurements were taken at onset, mid and offset points of both vowels (V) in a word-final VCV sequence, in the context [VbV # Emphatic trigger]. The strength of [#], a prosodic boundary, was varied syntactically to manipulate the presumed hierarchical strength of that boundary from zero (where the VbV and the trigger are in the same word) up to an intonational phrase boundary. We expect that the stronger the boundary, the greater the resistance to the spread of pharyngealisation. The duration of the final vowel (i.e., the pre-trigger vowel) was also measured to assess if pharyngealisation magnitude on it and on the first vowel is influenced by the temporal proximity to the emphatic trigger. Results show (1) that within word boundaries pharyngealisation effects are present on both vowels, and (2) there are effects of pharyngealisation on the final vowel, i.e. the pre-trigger across word and phrase boundaries, and (3) there is no evidence of pharyngealisation across an IP boundary. An examination of the pre-trigger vowel + pause duration suggests that the lack of coarticulatory effects on the final vowel, i.e., pre-trigger vowel, across an IP boundary may be due to the temporal distance from the trigger: all tokens in this condition had a pre-trigger pause. For word and phrase boundary conditions, F2 was higher the greater the temporal distance from the pharyngealised trigger. These results suggest that anticipatory pharyngealisation is qualitatively different within the word as compared to across word boundaries. More clearly, the magnitude of pharyngealisation is categorical within word boundaries, and gradient across prosodic boundaries higher than the word. These findings suggest that pharyngealisation within the word is phonological, whereas across word boundaries it is primarily a phonetic process, conditioned by the temporal proximity to the pharyngealised trigger. Results also show that the planned domain of [pharyngealisation] is the word. However, additional phonetic pharyngealisation effects can extend across word boundaries as a result of coarticulation.
|
|
Keyword:
coarticulation; models of speech production; pharyngealisation; prosodic boundaries; strength
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/8870
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Recording speech articulation in dialogue: Evaluating a synchronized double Electromagnetic Articulography setup
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
