1 |
Automatic Activation in Semantic and Episodic Memory: Implications for the Utility of Conscious Awareness
|
|
|
|
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Converging Semantic and Phonological Information in Lexical Retrieval and Selection in Young and Older Adults
|
|
|
|
In: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
No evidence of age-related differences in rapid lexical or declarative consolidation via fast mapping Follow-up Experiment in Younger Adults ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
An Examination of Age-Related Changes in the Control of Lexical and Sublexical Pathways in Mapping Spelling to Sound
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Responding to Nonwords in the Lexical Decision Task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Researchers have extensively documented how various statistical properties of words (e.g., word-frequency) influence lexical processing. However, the impact of lexical variables on nonword decision-making performance is less clear. This gap is surprising, since a better specification of the mechanisms driving nonword responses may provide valuable insights into early lexical processes. In the present study, item-level and participant-level analyses were conducted on the trial-level lexical decision data for almost 37,000 nonwords in the English Lexicon Project in order to identify the influence of different psycholinguistic variables on nonword lexical decision performance, and to explore individual differences in how participants respond to nonwords. Item-level regression analyses reveal that nonword response time was positively correlated with number of letters, number of orthographic neighbors, number of affixes, and baseword number of syllables, and negatively correlated with Levenshtein orthographic distance and baseword frequency. Participant-level analyses also point to within- and between-session stability in nonword responses across distinct sets of items, and intriguingly reveal that higher vocabulary knowledge is associated with less sensitivity to some dimensions (e.g., number of letters) but more sensitivity to others (e.g., baseword frequency). The present findings provide well-specified and interesting new constraints for informing models of word recognition and lexical decision.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329078 https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000064 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404174/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
Additive Effects of Word Frequency and Stimulus Quality: The Influence of Trial History and Data Transformations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Are All Letters Really Processed Equally and in Parallel? Further Evidence of a Robust First Letter Advantage
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Reaching for Words and Non-Words: Interactive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality on the characteristics of reaching movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Face (and Nose) Priming for Book: The Malleability of Semantic Memory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One, 6 (9) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One, 6 (9) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One, 6 (9) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One, 6 (9) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|