| 1 |
Susceptibility to auditory hallucinations is associated with spontaneous but not directed modulation of top-down expectations for speech
|
|
|
|
In: Neurosci Conscious (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Functional organisation for verb generation in children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
In: Neuroimage (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Functional organisation for verb generation in children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The role of intrinsic reward in adolescent word learning ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Data from: The influence of evaluative right/wrong feedback on phonological and semantic processes in word learning ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
The influence of evaluative right/wrong feedback on phonological and semantic processes in word learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Fractionating nonword repetition: the contributions of short-term memory and oromotor praxis are different
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Functional and quantitative MRI mapping of somatomotor representations of human supralaryngeal vocal tract
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Fractionating nonword repetition:The contributions of short-term memory and oromotor praxis are different
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Fractionating nonword repetition: The contributions of short-term memory and oromotor praxis are different
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Functional and Quantitative MRI Mapping of Somatomotor Representations of Human Supralaryngeal Vocal Tract
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Environmental sounds
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
How are environmental sounds relevant to the neurobiology of language? As studied in the 20th century, the purported structure of language and its processing—a human-specific “faculty” characterized by an abstract system of rules governing the hierarchical recombination of symbols encoded by arbitrary sound units—is seemingly unrelated to the recognition and comprehension of environmental sounds. Environmental sounds have often been used as a means of defining what is “language-specific” in the brain. However, as research in both language and environmental sounds has matured, useful parallels between the two domains have emerged, as well as some illustrative differences. In this chapter, we first discuss what environmental sounds are (and are not), and then move through different aspects of environmental sounds research that parallel fields of study in language. We consider, in detail, the behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for how environmental sounds are processed, highlighting the range of perceptual, cross-modal, semantic, and contextual processes involved, and finish by considering how studying environmental sounds informs our understanding of language processing.
|
|
Keyword:
Psychological Sciences
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00089-4
https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/21424/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
