DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 35

1
The effect of three basic task features on the sensitivity of acceptability judgment tasks
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics (2016-2021) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03101517 ; Glossa: a journal of general linguistics (2016-2021), Ubiquity Press, 2020, 5 (1), pp.72. ⟨10.5334/gjgl.980⟩ (2020)
BASE
Show details
2
COMPARING SOLUTIONS TO THE LINKING PROBLEM USING AN INTEGRATED QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORK OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
In: LANGUAGE, vol 95, iss 4 (2019)
BASE
Show details
3
Colorless green ideas do sleep furiously: gradient acceptability and the nature of the grammar
In: De Gruyter (2019)
BASE
Show details
4
Rhetorical questions as questions
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 11 (2007): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11; 121-133 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 11 (2007): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11; 121-133 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
5
Investigating variation in island effects : A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction [<Journal>]
Kush, Dave [Verfasser]; Lohndal, Terje [Sonstige]; Sprouse, Jon [Sonstige]
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
6
Grammar and the use of data
In: Sprouse, Jon; & Schütze, Carson T. (2017). Grammar and the use of data. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar Location: Oxford University Press. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0n100842 (2017)
BASE
Show details
7
Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 2, No 1 (2017); 14 ; 2397-1835 (2017)
Abstract: Previous investigations into the validity of acceptability judgment data have focused almost exclusively on type I errors (or false positives) because of the consequences of such errors for syntactic theories (Sprouse & Almeida 2012; Sprouse et al. 2013). The current study complements these previous studies by systematically investigating the type II error rate (false negatives), or equivalently, the statistical power, of a wide cross-section of possible acceptability judgment experiments. Though type II errors have historically been assumed to be less costly than type I errors, the dynamics of scientific publishing mean that high type II error rates (i.e., studies with low statistical power) can lead to increases in type I error rates in a given field of study. We present a set of experiments and resampling simulations to estimate statistical power for four tasks (forced-choice, Likert scale, magnitude estimation, and yes-no), 50 effect sizes instantiated by real phenomena, sample sizes from 5 to 100 participants, and two approaches to statistical analysis (null hypothesis and Bayesian). Our goals are twofold (i) to provide a fuller picture of the status of acceptability judgment data in syntax, and (ii) to provide detailed information that syntacticians can use to design and evaluate the sensitivity of acceptability judgment experiments in their own research.
Keyword: Acceptability judgments; experimental syntax; linguistic methodology; statistical power
URL: https://www.glossa-journal.org/jms/article/view/gjgl.236
https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236
BASE
Hide details
8
Investigating Variation in Island Effects: A Case Study of Norwegian Wh-Extraction
BASE
Show details
9
A structural distance effect for backward anaphora in Broca’s area: An fMRI study
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 138 (2014), 1-11
OLC Linguistik
Show details
10
Experimental syntax and island effects
Sprouse, Jon. - Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Pr., 2013
MPI-SHH Linguistik
Show details
11
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from "Linguistic Inquiry" 2001 - 2010
In: Lingua <Amsterdam>. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 134 (2013), 219-248
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
12
The empirical status of data in syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko
In: Language and cognitive processes. - Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 28 (2013) 3, 222-228
OLC Linguistik
Show details
13
Syntactic Islands and Learning Biases: Combining Experimental Syntax and Computational Modeling to Investigate the Language Acquisition Problem
In: Language acquisition. - Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum [[2000]] 20 (2013) 1, 23-68
OLC Linguistik
Show details
14
Syntax and the brain
In: The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax (Cambridge, 2013), p. 971-1005
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
15
The role of experimental syntax in an integrated cognitive science of language
In: The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics (Cambridge, 2013), p. 181-202
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
16
Judgment data
In: Research methods in linguistics (Cambridge, 2013), p. 27-50
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
17
Syntax and the brain
In: The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax (2013), S. 971-1005
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
18
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010
In: LINGUA, vol 134 (2013)
BASE
Show details
19
Syntactic Islands and Learning Biases: Combining Experimental Syntax and Computational Modeling to Investigate the Language Acquisition Problem
In: Pearl, Lisa; & Sprouse, Jon. (2013). Syntactic Islands and Learning Biases: Combining Experimental Syntax and Computational Modeling to Investigate the Language Acquisition Problem. Language Acquisition, 20(1), 23 - 68. doi:10.1080/10489223.2012.738742. UC Irvine: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1tf6r4cf (2013)
BASE
Show details
20
Experimental syntax and island effects
Hornstein, Norbert (Hrsg.); Sprouse, Jon (Hrsg.). - Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
1
0
12
0
1
0
1
Bibliographies
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
14
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern