1 |
Perceptual assimilation of regionally accented Mandarin lexical tones by native Beijing Mandarin listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Phonetic and phonological influences on the discrimination of non-native phones
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Perceived phonological overlap in second-language categories : the acquisition of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese native listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Effects of vowel coproduction on the timecourse of tone recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Perceptual assimilation of English dental fricatives by native speakers of European French
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
PAM revisits the articulatory organ hypothesis : Italians' perception of English anterior and Nuu-Chah-Nulth posterior voiceless fricatives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The influence of auditory-visual speech and clear speech on cross-language perceptual assimilation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The relative contributions of duration and amplitude to the perception of Japanese-accented English as a function of L2 experience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The influence of modality and speaking style on the assimilation type and categorization consistency of non-native speech
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The Perceptual Assimilation Model [1] proposes that nonnative contrast discrimination accuracy can be predicted by perceptual assimilation type. However, assimilation types have been based just on auditory-only (AO) citation speech. Since auditory-visual (AV) and clear speech can benefit nonnative speech perception [2, 3], we reasoned that modality and speaking style could influence assimilation. This was tested by presenting English monolinguals Sindhi consonants in a categorization task. Results showed that, across speaking styles, consonants were assimilated the same way in AV and AO. For consonants that were uncategorized in visual-only (VO) conditions: 1) their AO counterpart was more consistently categorized than AV; and 2) citation speech was also more consistently categorized than clear. Interestingly, this set of results was reversed for consonants that were assimilated to the same native category across modalities; participants were able to use the visual articulatory information to make more consistent categorization judgments for AV than AO. This was also the case for speaking style: clear speech was more consistently categorized than citation. Together these results demonstrate that the extent to which AV and clear speech is beneficial for cross-language perception may depend on the similarities between the articulatory characteristics of native and non-native consonants.
|
|
Keyword:
consonants; second language acquisition; Sindhi language; speech perception; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-611 http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:38155
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Lexical manipulation as a discovery tool for psycholinguistic research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
L2 phonological category formation and discrimination in learners varying in L2 experience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Cross-accent word recognition is affected by perceptual assimilation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|