DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...14
Hits 81 – 100 of 261

81
Preparing to be punched: Prediction may not always require inference of intentions
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 362-363
OLC Linguistik
Show details
82
Does what you hear predict what you will do and say?
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 370-371
OLC Linguistik
Show details
83
What does it mean to predict one's own utterances?
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 367-368
OLC Linguistik
Show details
84
Forward modelling requires intention recognition and non-impoverished predictions
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 351
OLC Linguistik
Show details
85
A developmental perspective on the integration of language production and comprehension
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 363-364
OLC Linguistik
Show details
86
The complexity-cost factor in bilingualism
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 355-356
OLC Linguistik
Show details
87
The poor helping the rich: How can incomplete representations monitor complete ones?
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 374-375
OLC Linguistik
Show details
88
Seeking predictions from a predictive framework
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 359-360
OLC Linguistik
Show details
89
Intermediate representations exclude embodiment
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 353-354
OLC Linguistik
Show details
90
Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: The case of signaling
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 371-372
OLC Linguistik
Show details
91
What is the context of prediction?
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 376-377
OLC Linguistik
Show details
92
“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 359
OLC Linguistik
Show details
93
Are forward models enough to explain self-monitoring? Insights from patients and eye movements
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 36 (2013) 4, 357-358
OLC Linguistik
Show details
94
Prediction at all levels: forward model predictions can enhance comprehension
BASE
Show details
95
Prediction and imitation in speech
Gambi, Chiara; Pickering, Martin J.. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2013
Abstract: It has been suggested that intra- and inter-speaker variability in speech are correlated. Interlocutors have been shown to converge on various phonetic dimensions. In addition, speakers imitate the phonetic properties of voices they are exposed to in shadowing, repetition, and even passive listening tasks. We review three theoretical accounts of speech imitation and convergence phenomena: (i) the Episodic Theory (ET) of speech perception and production (Goldinger, 1998); (ii) the Motor Theory (MT) of speech perception (Liberman and Whalen, 2000; Galantucci et al., 2006); (iii) Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT; Giles and Coupland, 1991; Giles et al., 1991). We argue that no account is able to explain all the available evidence. In particular, there is a need to integrate low-level, mechanistic accounts (like ET and MT), and higher-level accounts (like CAT). We propose that this is possible within the framework of an integrated theory of production and comprehension (Pickering and Garrod, 2013). Similarly to both ET and MT, this theory assumes parity between production and perception. Uniquely, however, it posits that listeners simulate speakers' utterances by computing forward-model predictions at many different levels, which are then compared to the incoming phonetic input. In our account phonetic imitation can be achieved via the same mechanism that is responsible for sensorimotor adaptation; i.e., the correction of prediction errors. In addition, the model assumes that the degree to which sensory prediction errors lead to motor adjustments is context-dependent. The notion of context subsumes both the preceding linguistic input and non-linguistic attributes of the situation (e.g., the speaker's and listener's social identities, their conversational roles, the listener's intention to imitate).
Keyword: Psychology
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689255
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23801971
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00340
BASE
Hide details
96
Processing verb-phrase ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence against the syntactic account
BASE
Show details
97
Prediction and imitation in speech
Gambi, Chiara; Pickering, Martin J.. - : Frontiers, 2013
BASE
Show details
98
The comprehension of anomalous sentences: evidence from structural priming
In: Cognition. - Amsterdam [u.a] : Elsevier 122 (2012) 2, 193-209
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
99
Mapping concepts to syntax: evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 66 (2012) 4, 833-849
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
100
How do people produce ungrammatical utterances?
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 67 (2012) 3, 355-370
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...14

Catalogues
4
0
106
0
2
0
1
Bibliographies
91
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
27
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
60
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern