• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Bitchener, John (4)
    • Crosthwaite, Peter (4)
    • The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives (4)
    • Vyatkina, Nina (4)
    • Edlin, Angela (3)
    • Feryok, Anne (3)
    • Abdollahzadeh, E (2)
    • Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel (2)
    • Ferreira Cabrera, Anita (2)
    • Lee, Andrea Rakushin (2)
    •   more
  • 
    Year:
    
    • 2022 (2)
    • 2021 (8)
    • 2020 (9)
    • 2019 (10)
    • 2018 (3)
    • 2017 (13)
    • 2016 (8)
    • 2015 (6)
    • 2014 (10)
    • 2013 (4)
    •   more
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type:
    
    • Article (57)
    • Book (37)
    • Miscellaneous (7)
  • 
    BLLDB-Access:
    • free (101)
    • subject to license (0)

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits 1 – 20 of 101 1 A three-stage model for implementing focused written corrective feedback Chong, Sin Wang. - 2022 BASE Show details 2 FACTORS INFLUENCING EFL STUDENTS’ UTILISATION OF TEACHER WRITTEN FEEDBACK Omer Hassan Ali Mahfoodh In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 98-122 (2022) (2022) BASE Show details 3 Written Corrective Feedback, Working Memory, and the Development of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of English Plurals ... Chingchit, Ornuma. - : Lancaster University, 2021 Abstract: Unlike oral corrective feedback that is unanimously well accepted in the second language acquisition (SLA) field as an effective tool that helps promote learners’ acquisition (e.g., Adams, Nuevo and Egi, 2011; Gass and Mackey, 2015), the role of written corrective feedback (WCF) and the extent to which it could help second language (L2) learners develop their second languages are still questionable (e.g., Polio, 2012; Shintani and R. Ellis, 2013). Few attention has also been given to test its long-term effect towards L2 development. Contributing to this gap presented in the literature, the current study examined and compared the effectiveness of direct focused and direct unfocused WCF on the development of Thai EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of English plurals. Learner differences in working memory capacity (WMC) were also measured in order to explore the extent to which this cognitive factor mediated the effectiveness of WCF. This study employed a pre-post-delayed posttest design and was ... Keyword: working memory; written corrective feedback URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1473 http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/written-corrective-feedback-working-memory-and-the-development-of-explicit-and-implicit-knowledge-of-english-plurals(42006959-c738-4a49-af3f-c7e506e42e97).html BASE Hide details 4 The Role of Individual Preferences in the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in an English for Academic Purposes Writing Course Perks, Bradley J; Colpitts, Bradley D. F.; Michaud, Matthew In: Australian Journal of Teacher Education (2021) BASE Show details 5 Assessing Writing in French-as-a-Foreign-Language: Teacher Practices and Learner Uptake Eva Thue Vold In: Languages; Volume 6; Issue 4; Pages: 210 (2021) BASE Show details 6 Student engagement with teacher written feedback on IELTS Writing Task 2 rehearsal essays Pearson, WS. - : University of Exeter, 2021. : Graduate School of Education, 2021 BASE Show details 7 Can a ‘pedagogical’ spellchecker improve spelling accuracy in L2 Spanish? Blazquez-Carretero, Miguel; Woore, Robert. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2021. : Center for Language & Technology, 2021. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2021 BASE Show details 8 Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary English learners’ written syntactic complexity Mohammadreza Valizadeh; Fatemeh Soltanpour In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 132-150 (2021) (2021) BASE Show details 9 Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning? Daron Benjamin Loo In: Issues in Language Studies, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2021) (2021) BASE Show details 10 Written Comments on Undergraduate Theses Written in Spanish as a First Language and English as a Foreign Language Roxanna Correa; Mónica Tapia-Ladino; Beatriz Arancibia In: Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 52-68 (2021) (2021) BASE Show details 11 Omani EFL writing instructors’ attitudes and reported and actual practices towards written corrective feedback in first year foundation programmes Al Zadjali, RSA. - : University of Exeter, 2020. : Education, 2020 BASE Show details 12 An Inquiry into Effective Written Feedback from EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives at a Saudi University Albogami, M. - : University of Exeter, 2020. : School of Education, 2020 BASE Show details 13 Validating written feedback in clinical formative assessment Page, Michael; Gardner, John; Booth, Joe. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 BASE Show details 14 Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution Crosthwaite, Peter; Storch, Neomy; Schweinberger, Martin. - : Elsevier, 2020 BASE Show details 15 THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING Dyah Fitri Mulati; Joko Nurkamto; Nur Arifah Drajati In: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) (2020) BASE Show details 16 The Effects of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedbacks on the Business Communication Texts of Technical University Students in Ghana Edward Owusu In: Applied Linguistics Research Journal, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 25-39 (2020) (2020) BASE Show details 17 Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations Wan Noor Miza Wan Mohd Yunus In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 95-107 (2020) (2020) BASE Show details 18 The effects of different types of written corrective feedback on students’ texting mistakes Hasan Güner Berkant; Nuriye Batmaz Derer; Ozgur Kursad Derer In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 174-187 (2020) (2020) BASE Show details 19 Students’ preferences and teachers’ beliefs towards written corrective feedback Alviana Tri Adhi Kencana In: ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 85-95 (2020) (2020) BASE Show details 20 英語熟達度と筆記による訂正フィードバックが暗示的知識と明示的知識の発達に与える効果 青山, 聡; 髙塚, 成信. - : 兵庫教育大学大学院連合学校教育学研究科, 2019 BASE Show details Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 101 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0