1 |
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial.
|
|
|
|
In: Symplectic Elements at Oxford ; Europe PubMed Central ; PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) ; Web of Science (Lite) (http://apps.webofknowledge.com/summary.do) ; CrossRef (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: Masked randomised trial
|
|
|
|
In: Symplectic Elements at Oxford ; Scopus (http://www.scopus.com/home.url) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
|
|
Cobo, E; Cortés, J; Ribera, J M; Cardellach, F; Selva-O’Callaghan, A; Kostov, B; García, L; Cirugeda, L; Altman, D G; González, J A; Sànchez, J A; Miras, F; Urrutia, A; Fonollosa, V; Rey-Joly, C; Vilardell, M. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd., 2011
|
|
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of an additional review based on reporting guidelines such as STROBE and CONSORT on quality of manuscripts.
|
|
Keyword:
Research
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6783 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22108262 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222149
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|