| 1 |
Concurrent predictors of word reading and reading comprehension for 9-year-olds with Williams syndrome
|
|
|
|
In: Read Writ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Orthographic processing is a key predictor of reading fluency in good and poor readers in a transparent orthography
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We used structural equation modeling to investigate sources of individual differences in oral reading fluency in a transparent orthography, Russian. Phonological processing, orthographic processing, and rapid automatized naming were used as independent variables, each derived from a combination of two scores: phonological awareness and pseudoword repetition, spelling and orthographic choice, and rapid serial naming of letters and digits, respectively. The contribution of these to oral text-reading fluency was evaluated as a direct relationship and via two mediators, decoding accuracy and unitized reading, measured with a single-word oral reading test. The participants were “good” and “poor” readers, i.e., those with reading skills above the 90(th) and below the 10(th) percentiles (n = 1,344, grades 2–6, St. Petersburg, Russia). In both groups, orthographic processing skills significantly contributed to fluency and unitized reading, but not to decoding accuracy. Phonological processing skills did not contribute directly to reading fluency in either group, while contributing to decoding accuracy and, to a lesser extent, to unitized reading. With respect to the roles of decoding accuracy and unitized reading, the results for good and poor readers diverged: in good readers, unitized reading, but not decoding accuracy, was significantly related to reading fluency. For poor readers, decoding accuracy (measured as pseudoword decoding) was related to reading fluency, but unitized reading was not. These results underscore the importance of orthographic skills for reading fluency even in an orthography with consistent phonology-to-orthography correspondences. They also point to a qualitative difference in the reading strategies of good and poor readers.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.002
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798206
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890420/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Statistical learning and spelling: Evidence from Brazilian prephonological spellers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Phonemic awareness is a more important predictor of orthographic processing than rapid serial naming: Evidence from Russian
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Spelling Well Despite Developmental Language Disorder: What Makes it Possible?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Do young children spell words syllabically? Evidence from learners of Brazilian Portuguese
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
