1 |
A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Word learning by children with phonological delays: Differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: Neighbourhood density & third person singular –s
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: A comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Whole-Word versus Part-Word Phonotactic Probability/Neighborhood Density in Word Learning by Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: Neighbourhood density & third person singular –s
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to test the effect of manipulating verb neighbourhood density in treatment targeting the third person singular lexical affix. Using a single-subject experimental design, 6 pre-schoolers with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: 1) treatment with sparse verbs or 2) treatment with dense verbs in 12 sessions. The third person singular lexical affix was targeted for 12 sessions of treatment in both conditions. Treatment gain and generalization were measured as the dependent variables. Third person singular % correct change from pre-treatment to post-treatment was measured using sentence production tasks with comparisons across the two treatment conditions. Treatment gain and generalization were greater for children enrolled in the sparse condition. Preliminary clinical recommendations are made and theoretical implications are discussed relative to neighbourhood density effects on lexical activation and storage in children with SLI.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23819675 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742070 https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.789928
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Grammatical Treamtment and Specific Language Impairment: Neighborhood Density & Third Person Singular -s
|
|
|
|
In: Jill R. Hoover (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The Interface Between Neighborhood Density & Optional Infinitives: Normal Development and Specific Language Impairment
|
|
|
|
In: Jill R. Hoover (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Interface between Neighborhood Density & Optional Infinitives: Normal Development and Specific Language Impairment
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The Influence of Part-Word Phonotactic Porbability
|
|
|
|
In: Jill R. Hoover (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|