| 1 |
A pilot economic evaluation of a feasibility trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) for post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
‘Emotion is of the essence. … Number one priority’: A nested qualitative study exploring psychosocial adjustment to stroke and aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
"Loneliness can also kill:" a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
"For them and for me": a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders' experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study explored the acceptability to service providers of delivering a novel group support intervention for people with aphasia (PWA) in a virtual world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The service providers were six group coordinators and 10 volunteers. Fourteen of the service providers participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview and 15 took part in a consensus group discussion. Qualitative interviews were analysed using framework analysis. For consensus group discussions, nominal group rankings were analysed and semantically similar responses were identified. RESULTS: Service providers described the virtual world as a safe space in which to communicate, connect, and experiment. The key barriers were technical, particularly relating to sound and connectivity issues. Service providers suggested a range of improvements to the virtual world and intervention programme. They reported that PWA benefitted from accessing a support group in a virtual world, with opportunities to connect socially and to develop their communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: Service providers found delivery of group support intervention in a virtual world to be acceptable. The use of a bespoke virtual world to deliver group support intervention may enhance the experience and increase its accessibility, enabling more PWA to benefit from this type of intervention.Implications for rehabilitationPeople with aphasia benefit from group support intervention but may find it difficult to access face-to-face groups. Delivery of group support intervention in a virtual world is acceptable to service providers, can enhance the experience and increase accessibility of groups. Technical challenges present potential barriers when delivering group support in a virtual world, relating particularly to sound and connectivity. Potential benefits of this model of delivery, as perceived by service providers, include opportunities to connect socially and to develop communication skills plus specific and strong levels of enjoyment of the virtual context.
|
|
Keyword:
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science; RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.2011436
https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/27365/
https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/27365/1/Delivering%20group%20support%20for%20people%20with%20aphasia%20in%20a%20virtual%20world%20experiences%20of%20service%20providers.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
“Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
“Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
“For them and for me”: a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders’ experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
