DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 76

1
Addressing patients’ communication support needs through speech-language pathologist-nurse information-sharing: Employing ethnography to understand the acute stroke context
Cruice, M.; Jones, J.; Barnard, R. A.. - : Taylor and Francis, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Managing ongoing swallow safety through information-sharing: an ethnography of speech and language therapists and nurses at work on stroke units
Barnard, R. A.; Cruice, M.; Jones, J.. - : Wiley, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
A Systematically Conducted Scoping Review of the Evidence and Fidelity of Treatments for Verb and Sentence Deficits in Aphasia: Sentence Treatments
Dipper, L.; Cruice, M.; Hickin, J.. - : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2022
BASE
Show details
4
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
BASE
Show details
5
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
Ali, M.; Ben Basat, A. L.; Berthier, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021
BASE
Show details
6
An aphasia research agenda–a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
BASE
Show details
7
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
Hersh, D.; Scarth, L.; Bannister, J.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions
Monnelly, K.; Marshall, J.; Cruice, M.. - : Taylor and Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
9
Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia
Boyle, M.; Botting, N.; Cruice, M.. - : MDPI, 2021
BASE
Show details
10
Scoping opinion: Speech and language therapists' views on extending their role to the urgent ear, nose and throat pathway.
BASE
Show details
11
A systematic review of language and communication intervention research delivered in groups to older adults living in care homes
Davis, L.; Botting, N.; Cruice, M.. - : Wiley, 2021
BASE
Show details
12
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes
Wray, F.; Clarke, D.; Cruice, M.. - : Public Library of Science, 2021
BASE
Show details
13
Assessing parent-child interaction in infant deafness
Curtin, M.; Herman, R.; Cruice, M.. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2021
BASE
Show details
14
Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers
BASE
Show details
15
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia
Marshall, J.; Moutou, C.; Caute, A.. - : Wiley, 2021
BASE
Show details
16
Assessing Parent Behaviours in Parent-Child Interactions with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Infants Aged 0-3 Years: A Systematic Review
Herman, R.; Morgan, G.; Rodgers, L.. - : MDPI, 2021
BASE
Show details
17
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
Abstract: Background: Although spoken discourse is an outcome prioritised by all stakeholders in aphasia rehabilitation, assessment and treatment of discourse are not routine clinical practice. The small evidence base, varied clinical expertise, multiple barriers in the workplace, and challenges for clients in understanding their altered language abilities all contribute to this situation. These factors need serious consideration when developing a new treatment. Involving intended stakeholders as partners in the development process is recommended. This assists with future implementation by ensuring assessment and treatment are practical, feasible, and acceptable to those who will deliver and undertake it. Aims: This paper reports on the coproduction phase of the Linguistic Underpinnings of Narrative in Aphasia (LUNA) research project and describes the levels of partners’ involvement, the outcomes and impact of coproduction, and the factors that influenced it. Methods and procedures: Four partners with aphasia and four speech and language therapists (SLTs) worked with academic team members across a 6-month period to create the LUNA assessment and treatment. Separate sessions were held with partners with aphasia (monthly) and SLTs (fortnightly). Coproduction methods included open discussion, the Someone Who Isn’t Me (SWIM) technique (thinking from others’ perspectives), low and high fidelity prototypes, flexible brainstorming, card sort, and active experimentation with assessment and treatment tasks. Verbal and written information was presented, shared and documented during each session in supportive formats, and each session summarised as accessible minutes. Outcomes and Results: Partners contributed at consultation, cooperation, and co-learning levels during the coproduction phase. Outcomes included joined-up thinking across assessment-goal setting-treatment-desired outcomes; agreed decisions and content for assessment protocol and treatment manual; clarity on personalised, meaningful, and relevant treatment; therapeutic alliance operationalised in treatment manual; and more. Impacts included increased confidence, self-knowledge, pride, validation, peer support, networking, and benefits to SLTs’ services. Coproduction was positively influenced by consistent session structure and conduct, group dynamics, accessible communication methods, active task experimentation, and SWIM technique. Although the process was time and labour intensive, all partners considered this worthwhile. Conclusions: LUNA has exemplified how an inclusive coproduction process can work well despite the language challenges of aphasia. Authors also believe that coproduction with intended users has resulted in products (assessment protocol, treatment manual) that are more practical, feasible, and acceptable to clinicians and clients than if designed by academics alone. This latter claim now needs testing on a wide scale.
Keyword: aphasia; assessment; Communication Sciences and Disorders; coproduction; discourse; Medicine and Health Sciences; treatment
URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11696&context=ecuworkspost2013
https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/10690
BASE
Hide details
18
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
Ali, M.; Soroli, E.; Jesus, L.M.T.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021
BASE
Show details
19
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
Dipper, L.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020
BASE
Show details
20
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
76
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern