DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 20 of 20

1
'Believe' is Strong but Subjective: Experimental Evidence from Hedging
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 497-514 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 497-514 ; 2629-6055 (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Verum accent IS VERUM, but not always focus
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 188–202 ; 2473-8689 (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Parentheticality, assertion strength, and polarity [<Journal>]
Koev, Todor [Verfasser]
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
4
Strong beliefs, weak commitments
Koev, Todor [Verfasser]. - Konstanz : KOPS Universität Konstanz, 2019
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
5
Parentheticality, assertion strength, and discourse
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 21 Nr. 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21; 679-694 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 21 No 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21; 679-694 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
6
Two puzzles about appositives: Projection and perspective shift
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 18 (2014): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18; 217-234 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 18 (2014): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18; 217-234 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
7
On Quotational Indefinites
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 412-429 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 20 (2016): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20; 412-429 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
8
Strong beliefs, weak commitments
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 23 Nr. 2 (2019): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23; 1-18 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 23 No 2 (2019): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23; 1-18 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
9
Strong beliefs, weak commitments
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung ; 23 (2019), 2. - S. 1-18. - Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz. - eISSN 2629-6055 (2019)
BASE
Show details
10
Parentheticality, assertion strength, and discourse
Koev, Todor [Verfasser]. - Konstanz : KOPS Universität Konstanz, 2018
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
11
Parentheticality, assertion strength, and discourse
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung ; 21 (2018), 1. - S. 679-694. - Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz. - eISSN 2629-6055 (2018)
BASE
Show details
12
Adverbs of Change, Aspect, and Underspecification
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 27; 22-42 ; 2163-5951 (2017)
BASE
Show details
13
On Quotational Indefinites
Koev, Todor [Verfasser]. - Konstanz : KOPS Universität Konstanz, 2016
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
14
The Shiftability of German Appositive Relatives across Intensional Contexts: Two Experimental Studies
In: Proceedings of the 33. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics : [held March 27-29, 2015 at the Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia] (2016), S. 237-245
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
15
On Quotational Indefinites
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung ; 20 (2016). - S. 412-429. - Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz. - eISSN 2629-6055 (2016)
BASE
Show details
16
Two puzzles about appositives : Projection and perspective shift
Koev, Todor [Verfasser]. - Konstanz : KOPS Universität Konstanz, 2014
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
17
Two puzzles about appositives : Projection and perspective shift
In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung ; 18 (2014). - S. 217-234. - Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz. - eISSN 2629-6055 (2014)
BASE
Show details
18
Apposition and the structure of discourse ...
Koev, Todor K.. - : No Publisher Supplied, 2013
Abstract: The current dissertation focuses on two interpretational properties of APPOSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: (i) their (often) NOT-AT-ISSUE status, i.e. the fact that they can be perceived as secondary to the main point of the utterance, and (ii) their PROJECTION behavior, i.e. the fact that they typically escape the scope of external operators (e.g. Chierchia & McConnell-Ginet 2000, Potts 2005). I analyze appositive constructions as adjuncts (e.g. Jackendoff 19&&, Potts 2005) which are interpreted as in-situ conjuncts. Root clauses, appositive relative clauses, and possibly all appositive constructions are assumed to form FORCE PHRASES (see Rizzi 199&, Krifka 2001). Force heads are operators which introduce a fresh variable for the proposition of their scope. Since lexical expressions (operators or predicates) are relativized to propositional variables, Force heads can bind into the lexical expressions in their syntactic scope (cf. Stone 1999, Stone & Hardt 1999). This mechanism keeps apart ...
URL: https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/41808/
https://dx.doi.org/10.7282/t3qn64sd
BASE
Hide details
19
Definiteness as agreement : evidence from Bulgarian
In: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on formal linguistics (Somerville, MA, 2011), p. 133-141
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
20
Evidentiality and temporal distance learning
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 21; 115-134 ; 2163-5951 (2011)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
13
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern