• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Marshall, J. (85)
    • Marshall, J (41)
    • Cruice, M. (25)
    • Hilari, K. (23)
    • Wilson, S. (21)
    • Behn, N. (20)
    • Northcott, S. (18)
    • Flood, C. (15)
    • Goldsmith, K. (15)
    • McVicker, S. (15)
    •   more
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium:
    
    • Online (115)
    • Print (26)
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access:
    • free (141)
    • subject to license (0)

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8 Hits 1 – 20 of 141 1 A pilot economic evaluation of a feasibility trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) for post-stroke aphasia Flood, C.; Behn, N.; Marshall, J.. - : SAGE Publications, 2022 BASE Show details 2 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Hersh, D.; Scarth, L.; Bannister, J.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021 BASE Show details 3 Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions Monnelly, K.; Marshall, J.; Cruice, M.. - : Taylor and Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 4 Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia Boyle, M.; Botting, N.; Cruice, M.. - : MDPI, 2021 BASE Show details 5 ‘Emotion is of the essence. … Number one priority’: A nested qualitative study exploring psychosocial adjustment to stroke and aphasia Simpson, A.; McVicker, S.; Behn, N.. - : Wiley, 2021 BASE Show details 6 "Loneliness can also kill:" a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others Hilari, K.; Flood, C.; Marshall, J.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 7 "For them and for me": a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders' experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial Northcott, S.; Behn, N.; Monnelly, K.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 8 SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia Behn, N.; Moss, B.; McVicker, S.. - : BMJ Publishing Group, 2021 BASE Show details 9 Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers Caute, A.; Cruice, M.; Devane, N.. - 2021 BASE Show details 10 Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia Marshall, J.; Moutou, C.; Caute, A.. - : Wiley, 2021 BASE Show details 11 Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial Behn, N.; McVicker, S.; Simpson, A.. - : SAGE Publications, 2021 BASE Show details 12 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Cruice, M.; Pritchard, M.; Bannister, J.... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021) BASE Show details 13 “Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ... Moss, B.; Behn, N.; Northcott, S.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 14 “Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ... Moss, B.; Behn, N.; Northcott, S.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 15 “For them and for me”: a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders’ experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial Northcott, S.; Behn, N.; Monnelly, K.. - 2021 BASE Show details 16 Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) Hilari, K.; Behn, N.; Marshall, J.. - : SAGE Publications, 2020 BASE Show details 17 Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base Dipper, L.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.; Botting, N.; Hersh, D.; Pritchard, M.; Cruice, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 Abstract: Background Improved discourse production is a priority for all key stakeholders in aphasia rehabilitation. A Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for aphasia found speech and language therapy treatment to be effective for improving the ability to communicate in everyday interaction. However, this large-scale review did not focus exclusively on treatment for discourse production and did not include other treatment research designs. Thus, the extent of the evidence base addressing discourse interventions is currently unclear. Objective The present study undertakes the first systematic review of research on treatment for discourse production in aphasia, appraises the quality of the evidence base; characterises the methods for measuring outcomes; and describes discourse treatment in terms of both content and efficacy. Design Scopus, Medline, and EmBase databases were searched, providing 334 records. Twenty-five studies (reporting on 127 participants) met inclusion criteria and were reviewed with the following research questions: What is the quality of the study designs used? How complete is the intervention reporting? What is the range, type, and content of outcome measures used? What is the range, type, and content of discourse treatments reported to date? Are discourse treatments efficacious? Results Seven of the 25 studies met the criteria for quality review, with 3 RCTs scoring moderately well and 3 (of 4) case studies scoring moderate-low. Most studies had adequate levels of completeness of treatment reporting, with 3 scoring highly. There were 514 different outcome measures reported across the 25 studies, with measures of words-in-discourse the most common. Studies were grouped into six treatment categories: “word production in discourse”, “sentence production in discourse”, “discourse macrostructure”, “discourse scripts”, “multi-level”, and “no consensus”. Twenty-two studies reported post-treatment gains, most commonly noted in increased word production. Changes in sentence production and discourse macrostructure were present but infrequently assessed. Conclusions Discourse treatment is an emerging field of research. Despite limitations in the evidence base, there are clear positive signs that discourse treatment is efficacious. There is emerging evidence for beneficial effects on word and sentence production in discourse, for improved discourse macrostructure, and for treatments working at multiple levels of language. To strengthen the evidence in this field and improve outcomes for people with aphasia, we need more discourse treatment research using an explicit theoretical rationale, high-quality study designs, more complete reporting, and agreed treatment and assessment methods. Keyword: P Philology. Linguistics; RC Internal medicine URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/24272/ https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/24272/3/Dipper%20at%20al.%202020.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765305 BASE Hide details 18 UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation Cruice, M.; Botting, N.; Marshall, J.. - : Wiley, 2020 BASE Show details 19 Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia Cruice, M.; Woolf, C.; Caute, A.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 BASE Show details 20 CreaTable Content and Tangible Interaction in Aphasia Cruice, M.; Neate, T.; Marshall, J.. - : ACM, 2020 BASE Show details Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 21 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 3 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 2 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 115 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0