| 1 |
Islands: A Mixed Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: http://lfg09.net/abstracts/lfg09abs_falk.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Do We Wanna (or Hafta) Have Empty Categories
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/12/papers/lfg07falk.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The English Auxiliary System Revisited *
|
|
|
|
In: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/8/lfg03falk.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Constituent Structure and Grammatical Functions in the Hebrew Action Nominal.” in Miriam Butt and Tracy
|
|
|
|
In: http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/17/Falk.pdf (2001)
|
|
Abstract:
Hebrew noun phrases in general, and action nominals in particular, pose interesting theoretical and descriptive problems. (1) a. ha- ia el ha- politikay the- wife of the- politician b. eet ha- politikay wife.CONSTR the- politician c. it- o el ha- politikay wife- his of the- politician ‘the politician’s wife’ (2) a. ibud ha- mumxim et hakolot yadanit processing the- experts ACC votes manually ‘the experts ’ manual processing of the ballots’ b. sgirat ha- mankal et ha- misrad zmanit closure.CONSTR the- director ACC the- office temporarily ‘the director’s temporary closure of the office’ In (1) we see the three types of genitive constructions in Hebrew. In the free genitive (1a), the possessive nominal is marked by the preposition el. In the construct state genitive (1b), the possessive immediately follows the head noun, and the head noun appears in a special morphological form traditionally called the construct state. The double genitive (1c) combines a pronominal suffix on the head noun (in a form phonologically related to the construct state) with a PP headed by el. In (2) we see a clearly nominal head in a construct state genitive construction, followed by an accusative object and an adverb. These Hebrew noun phrase patterns have been discussed in a series of studies in the Government/Binding (GB) and Minimalist Program (MP) variants of transformational theory. The analyses, although they differ from each other in details, all posit head movement from N to a functional head position (generally identified with D), and most of them hypothesize V-to-N head movement in the action nominal.
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.472.3549
http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/17/Falk.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Case: Interaction between Syntax and Discourse Grammar
|
|
|
|
In: http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG3/falk.ps (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Case Typology and Case Theory
|
|
|
|
In: http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~msyfalk/Case-T%26T.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
2001b) “Constituent Structure and Grammatical Functions in the Hebrew Action Nominal.” in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds
|
|
|
|
In: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01falk.pdf (1989)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
On the Representation of Case and Agreement
|
|
|
|
In: http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/conferences/lfg06/abstracts/falk-abs.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
