1 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Comparing higher and lower weekly treatment intensity for chronic aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The Consequences of the Consequences: The Impact of the Environment on People With Aphasia Over Time
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Treatment for people with chronic aphasia - investigation of high and low intensity, constraint and multimodal treatments
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Intensity of aphasia therapy - How intensive does therapy need to be in chronic aphasia? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Are multi-modal methods as effective as constraint in aphasia treatment? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
|
|
Power, Emma; Thomas, Emma; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda; Togher, Leanne; Nickels, Lyndsey; Hersh, Deborah J; Godecke, Erin; O'Halloran, Robyn; Lamont, Sue; O'Connor, Claire; Clarke, Kim
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
Objectives: To develop and validate a national set of best practice statements for use in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation. Design: Literature review and statement validation using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). Participants: A national Community of Practice of over 250 speech pathologists, researchers, consumers and policymakers developed a framework consisting of eight areas of care in aphasia rehabilitation. This framework provided the structure for the development of a care pathway containing aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements. Nine speech pathologists with expertise in aphasia rehabilitation participated in two rounds of RAND/UCLA appropriateness ratings of the statements. Panellists consisted of researchers, service managers, clinicians and policymakers. Main outcomes measures: Statements that achieved a high level of agreement and an overall median score of 7–9 on a nine-point scale were rated as ‘appropriate’. Results: 74 best practice statements were extracted from the literature and rated across eight areas of care (eg, receiving the right referrals, providing intervention). At the end of Round 1, 71 of the 74 statements were rated as appropriate, no statements were rated as inappropriate, and three statements were rated as uncertain. All 74 statements were then rated again in the face-to-face second round. 16 statements were added through splitting existing items or adding new statements. Seven statements were deleted leaving 83 statements. Agreement was reached for 82 of the final 83 statements. Conclusions: This national set of 82 best practice statements across eight care areas for the rehabilitation of people with aphasia is the first to be validated by an expert panel. These statements form a crucial component of the Australian Aphasia Rehabilitation Pathway (AARP) (http://www.aphasiapathway.com.au) and provide the basis for more consistent implementation of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation.
|
|
Keyword:
Medicine and Health Sciences
|
|
URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/2398 https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3409&context=ecuworkspost2013
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
'I do the best I can': an in-depth exploration of the aphasia management pathway in the acute hospital setting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
'That doesn't translate': The role of evidence-based practice in disempowering speech pathologists in acute aphasia management
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Creating communicatively accessible healthcare environments : perceptions of speech-language pathologists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
“Communication is taking a back seat”: speech pathologists’ perceptions of aphasia management in acute hospital settings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Assess for Success: Evidence for Therapeutic Assessment
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2013 (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|