| 1 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
PROVERBS AS MEANS OF EXPRESSING NATIONAL-CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ENGLISH NEWSPAPER ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
PROVERBS AS MEANS OF EXPRESSING NATIONAL-CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ENGLISH NEWSPAPER ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
ЗНАЧЕНИЕ НАУЧНО-ПОПУЛЯРНОЙ СТАТЬИ ... : THE IMPORTANCE OF A POPULAR SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE ...
|
|
Кузибаева, Р.Ш.. - : Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Viewing angle in novice L2 lexical learning in British Sign Language (BSL) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Development of a Computational Tool for the Estimation of Alveolar Bone Loss in Oral Radiographic Images
|
|
|
|
In: Computation; Volume 10; Issue 1; Pages: 8 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
‘Do’-support in the northern Italian Camuno
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 5211 ; 2473-8689 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Nanosyntactic Analysis of Turkish Case System
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic; Vol 6 (2021); 5051 ; 2641-3485 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Neglected factors bearing on reaction time in language production
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0364-0213 ; EISSN: 1551-6709 ; Cognitive Science ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03505517 ; Cognitive Science, Wiley, 2021, 45, pp.article 13050. ⟨10.1111/cogs.13050⟩ (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; The input to phonological reasoning are alternations, that is, variations in the pronunciation of related words, such as in electri[k]electri[s]-ity. But phonologists cannot agree what counts as a relevant alternation: the issue is highly contentious despite a research record of over 50 years. We believe that the experimental setup presented may contribute to this debate based on a kind of evidence that was not brought to bear to date. Our experiment was thus designed to distinguish between alternations where phonological computation plays no role, and those where it has contributed to language production. The design manipulates two factors that to date have not been considered in experimental studies of language production: linguistic complexity and alternation specificity. The former is understood as extra processing demands issued by two types of linguistic activity, morphosyntactic and phonological. Our results show that reaction time latencies are longer when participants are burdened with both morphosyntactic and phonological tasks than when they carry out just a morphosyntactic task, and they are still shorter in absence of both types of demands. These results allowed us to address alternation specificity, that is, the fact that different alternations (within a language or across languages) may be driven by different production routines (an idea that is consensual among linguists but underdeveloped in the psycholinguistic literature). Our study shows that four different alternations in French produce alternation-specific signatures in reaction time latencies. These findings may thus redound to the advantage of psycholinguistic studies by identifying two new factors, as well as produce results that speak to the linguistic quarrels.
|
|
Keyword:
[SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; Alternation specificity; Language production; Linguistic complexity; Morphosyntax; Phonology; Reaction time
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13050
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03505517
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
