1 |
Replacing vertical actions by mouse movements: a web-suited paradigm for investigating vertical spatial associations
|
|
|
|
In: Psychol Res (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Hybrid models of cognition: The influence of modal and amodal cues in language processing tasks
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The Role of Predictability During Negation Processing in Truth-Value Judgment Tasks
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Processing of Negation and Polarity: An Overview
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Contrary to Expectations: Does Context Influence the Processing Cost Associated with Negation?
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Negation Processing in Children with ADHD: The Generic Problem of Using Negation in Instructions
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
Recent studies have suggested that negation comprehension falls back onto inhibitory brain systems that are also crucial for impulse control and other non-linguistic control domains (Beltran et al., 2018, 2019; de Vega et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2020). Against this backdrop, the present pilot study investigated the use of negation within directional instructions (i.e., “not left”, “now left”, “not right”, “now right”) in children with ADHD and a control group. The results indicate that children in general have a long response delay following negative compared to affirmative instructions. Additionally, there was a tendency for this effect to be more pronounced in the ADHD group. Together, these results suggest that negation processing might indeed demand inhibitory control processes, which are differently available across different subgroups. Thus, the current study provides evidence that using negation in imperatives or instructions is generally rather critical and should be avoided if possible, but that negation use is probably even more problematic in specific clinical populations. Potential implications of these results will be discussed.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8660710/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374888 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09789-w
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
Conceptual representation of real-world surface material: Early integration with linguistic-labels indicated in the N400-component
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Can We Prepare to Negate? Negation as a Reversal Operator
|
|
|
|
In: J Cogn (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
How do German bilingual schoolchildren process German prepositions? - A study on language-motor interactions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Symbol grounding without direct experience : do words inherit sensorimotor activation from purely linguistic context?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Integration of Visual Information about the Speaker during Sentence Processing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Symbol grounding without direct experience: Do words inherit sensorimotor activation from purely linguistic context? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Symbol grounding without direct experience: Do words inherit sensorimotor activation from purely linguistic context? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Integration of Visual Information about the Speaker during Sentence Processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Predicting Lexical Priming Effects from Distributional Semantic Similarities: A Replication with Extension ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|