1 |
Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming
|
|
|
|
In: Behav Res Methods (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Does omitting the accent mark in a word affect sentence reading? Evidence from Spanish ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Does omitting the accent mark in a word affect sentence reading? Evidence from Spanish ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Are better young readers more likely to confuse their mother with their mohter? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Are better young readers more likely to confuse their mother with their mohter? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
How are words with diacritical vowels represented in the mental lexicon? Evidence from Spanish and German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
How are words with diacritical vowels represented in the mental lexicon? Evidence from Spanish and German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The Omission of Accent Marks Does Not Hinder Word Recognition: Evidence From Spanish
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
Recent research has found that the omission of accent marks in Spanish does not produce slower word identification times in go/no-go lexical decision and semantic categorization tasks [e.g., cárcel (prison) = carcel], thus suggesting that vowels like á and a are represented by the same orthographic units during word recognition and reading. However, there is a discrepant finding with the yes/no lexical decision task, where the words with the omitted accent mark produced longer response times than the words with the accent mark. In Experiment 1, we examined this discrepant finding by running a yes/no lexical decision experiment comparing the effects for words and non-words. Results showed slower response times for the words with omitted accent mark than for those with the accent mark present (e.g., cárcel < carcel). Critically, we found the opposite pattern for non-words: response times were longer for the non-words with accent marks (e.g., cárdil > cardil), thus suggesting a bias toward a “word” response for accented items in the yes/no lexical decision task. To test this interpretation, Experiment 2 used the same stimuli with a blocked design (i.e., accent mark present vs. omitted in all items) and a go/no-go lexical decision task (i.e., respond only to “words”). Results showed similar response times to words regardless of whether the accent mark was omitted (e.g., cárcel = carcel). This pattern strongly suggests that the longer response times to words with an omitted accent mark in yes/no lexical decision experiments are a task-dependent effect rather than a genuine reading cost.
|
|
Keyword:
Psychology
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966338 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710576/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794923
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Do Grading Gray Stimuli Help to Encode Letter Position?
|
|
|
|
In: Vision (Basel) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Does narrator variability facilitate incidental word learning in the classroom?
|
|
|
|
In: Mem Cognit (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Which Factors Modulate Letter Position Coding in Pre-literate Children?
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Supplementary_Material_ – Supplemental material for On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Supplementary_Material_ – Supplemental material for On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|