| 1 |
Constructing collective identities and solidarity in premiers’ early speeches on COVID-19: a global perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
COVID-19: the world and the words: linguistic means and discursive constructions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Discursive approaches to populism across disciplines: the return of populists and the people
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
When populists call populists populists: ‘Populism’ and ‘Populist’ as political keywords in German and British political discourse
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Introduction: the return of populists and the people: discursive approaches to populism across disciplines
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Discourse and political culture: the language of the Third Way in Germany and the UK
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Populist elements in the election manifestoes of AfD and UKIP
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The term populism is omnipresent in current political science and political discourse. This paper discusses, how so-called “populist” discourse is linguistically construed in the 2017 election manifestos of the German Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and the British United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP). It does so by operationalising populism concepts from political science, specifically the difference between exclusive and inclusive populism. In order to investigate how “populist” discourses depend on the respective political culture of a discourse community, these categories are employed in a corpus based comparative politico-linguistic analysis. Based on a corpus of German and British election manifestos from 2017, the paper demonstrates that both UKIP and the AfD combine elements of in inclusive populism based on demands of a democratic renewal, and an exclusive populism based on the idea the people as a homogeneous ethnos. The discursive realisation, however, differs because of general historic and political differences such as Britain being a state of four nations and the AfD aiming to avoid a rhetoric known from Germany’s past. Particularly pronounced are differences in the delineation to the enemy “European Union” as both parties link their euro-sceptical discourse to different central signifiers of the German and British political culture.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/434621/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/434621/1/zaa_01_kranert_AUTHOR_SUBMITTED_MANUSCRIPT.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Populistische Elemente in den Wahlprogrammen von AfD und UKIP
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Populistische Elemente in den Wahlprogrammen von AfD und UKIP
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years:A study of parliamentary language using corpus linguistic methods and automated semantic tagging
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
“Dancing with doxa”: A “Rhetorical Political Analysis” of David Cameron’s sense of Britishness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Review of Piotr Cap & Urszula Okulska (eds). (2013)Analyzing genres in political communication: Theory and practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Text and Context in the Discourses of the Third Way in Germany and the United Kingdom A Comparative Study of the Language of ‘New Labour’ and ‘Die Neue Mitte’
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Antoon De Rycker & Zuraidah Mohd Don (eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013. Pp. vii, 489. Hb. $149.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
