| 5 |
Language use and language attitudes in multilingual habitats: A survey among Filipino students ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Language, terminology and the readability of online cancer information
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Turn management and backchannels
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
What are backchannels? Backchannels can be generally defined as the intermittent vocal noises e.g. mm, oh, right, yeah, made by the listener while in conversation with another person. They are known by a variety of other names, reflecting the different linguistic and other theoretical paradigms in which they have been investigated. One such alternative name is response token, used in conversation analysis (Gardner 2001, McCarthy 2002), where they are treated as potential or actual turns in the construction of dialogue, but this tends to the overshadow the other kinds of feedback that backchannels may provide. In the following paper we adopt the more inclusive term backchannels for vocal noises uttered from the back channel in counterpoint to the speech of the turn-holder in the main channel. The term backchannel makes no assumptions about their role in discourse, and serves as a neutral basis for the investigation of backchannel functions reported below. The term itself will be abbreviated to BC(s) in the body of the text following. The prototypical BCs discussed in previous research are simple monosyllabic or monomorphemic forms, like those already illustrated. They may be more or less lexical in their content: compare mm with right. BCs may be conjoined in pairs or clusters, e.g. oh yes, as noted by Tottie (1991) and Clancy et al. (1996); they may also be reduplicated, e.g. yeah, yeah. Apart from those structural possibilities yielding simple or complex/compound BCs, any BC may be uttered as a single piece of feedback to the turn-holder’s talk, or as one of a set in a string, in counterpoint to a longer turn. Compare the BCs produced by the listeners ($B) in examples (1) and (2) below, where they are marked up according to the ICE corpus annotation system (see further Section 15.3 below). The BCs are numbered to indicate the locations where they coincide with the speaker’s talk, i.e. not as follow-up responses to it. They are thus “turn-internal” in their use, in Kjellmer’s (2009: 88) terms. ; 22 page(s)
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1068589
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The Construction of online Health TermFinder and its English–Chinese bilingualization
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
