DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Hits 1 – 20 of 89

1
Precision communication: Physicians’ linguistic adaptation to patients’ health literacy
In: Sci Adv (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Multi-document Cohesion Network Analysis: Visualizing Intratextual and Intertextual Links
In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (2020)
BASE
Show details
3
Employing computational linguistics techniques to identify limited patient health literacy: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study
In: Health Serv Res (2020)
BASE
Show details
4
Extended Multi-document Cohesion Network Analysis Centered on Comprehension Prediction
In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (2020)
BASE
Show details
5
Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Automated Text Simplification
In: Artificial Intelligence in Education (2020)
BASE
Show details
6
Challenges and solutions to employing natural language processing and machine learning to measure patients’ health literacy and physician writing complexity: The ECLIPPSE study
In: J Biomed Inform (2020)
BASE
Show details
7
Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes: Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study
In: J Gen Intern Med (2019)
BASE
Show details
8
Writing flexibility in argumentative essays: a multidimensional analysis [<Journal>]
Allen, Laura K. [Verfasser]; Likens, Aaron D. [Verfasser]; McNamara, Danielle S. [Verfasser]
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
9
Incorporating Learning Characteristics into Automatic Essay Scoring Models: What Individual Differences and Linguistic Features Tell Us about Writing Quality ...
BASE
Show details
10
Incorporating Learning Characteristics into Automatic Essay Scoring Models: What Individual Differences and Linguistic Features Tell Us about Writing Quality ...
BASE
Show details
11
To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems
In: Journal of Writing Assessment, vol 8, iss 1 (2015)
BASE
Show details
12
Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix
McNamara, Danielle S.. - New York [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
13
Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners
In: Journal of second language writing. - Amsterdam ˜[u.a]œ : Elsevier 26 (2014), 66-79
OLC Linguistik
Show details
14
Analyzing Discourse Processing Using a Simple Natural Language Processing Tool
In: Discourse processes. - London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 51 (2014) 5, 511-534
OLC Linguistik
Show details
15
Society for Text and Discourse Annual Meeting 2013: Introduction to the Special Issue
In: Discourse processes. - London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 51 (2014) 5, 357-358
OLC Linguistik
Show details
16
What Is Successful Writing? An Investigation Into the Multiple Ways Writers Can Write Successful Essays
In: Written communication. - Beverly Hills, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage Publ. 31 (2014) 2, 184-214
OLC Linguistik
Show details
17
Emergent behaviors in computer-based learning environments: Computational signals of catching up
In: Computers in human behavior. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 41 (2014), 62-70
OLC Linguistik
Show details
18
Analyzing discourse processing using a simple natural language processing tool
In: Discourse Processes 51 (2014) 5, 511-534
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
Show details
19
Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation
In: Journal of Writing Assessment, vol 7, iss 1 (2014)
Abstract: This study investigates the potential for linguistic microfeatures related to length, complexity, cohesion, relevance, topic, and rhetorical style to predict L2 writing proficiency. Computational indices were calculated by two automated text analysis tools (Coh-Metrix and the Writing Assessment Tool) and used to predict human essay ratings in a corpus of 480 independent essays written for the TOEFL. A stepwise regression analysis indicated that six linguistic microfeatures explained 60% of the variance in human scores for essays in a test set, providing an exact accuracy of 55% and an adjacent accuracy of 96%. To examine the limitations of the model, a post-hoc analysis was conducted to investigate differences in the scoring outcomes produced by the model and the human raters for essays with score differences of two or greater (N = 20). Essays scored as high by the regression model and low by human raters contained more word types and perfect tense forms compared to essays scored high by humans and low by the regression model. Essays scored high by humans but low by the regression model had greater coherence, syntactic variety, syntactic accuracy, word choices, idiomaticity, vocabulary range, and spelling accuracy as compared to essays scored high by the model but low by humans. Overall, findings from this study provide important information about how linguistic microfeatures can predict L2 essay quality for TOEFL-type exams and about the strengths and weaknesses of automatic essay scoring models.
URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06n1v820
BASE
Hide details
20
What's so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing
Crossley, Scott A.; Yang, Hae Sung; McNamara, Danielle S.. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2014. : Center for Language & Technology, 2014
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Catalogues
2
0
38
0
1
0
1
Bibliographies
34
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
13
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
21
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern