81 |
Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
82 |
The assimilation of L2 Australian English vowels to L1 Japanese vowel categories : vocabulary size matters
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
83 |
Perceptual evidence of Modern Greek voiced stops as phonological categories
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
84 |
Evidence of a near-merger in Western Sydney Australian English vowels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
85 |
Six and twelve-month-olds' discrimination of native versus non-native between- and within-organ fricative place contrasts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
86 |
Greek-Australian bilinguals match the VOTs of Greek and Australian English native speakers depending on language context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
87 |
Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults : effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
89 |
Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Language experience systematically constrains perception of speech contrasts that deviate phonologically and/or phonetically from those of the listener’s native language. These effects are most dramatic in adults, but begin to emerge in infancy and undergo further development through at least early childhood. The central question addressed here is: How do nonnative speech perception findings bear on phonological and phonetic aspects of second language (L2) perceptual learning? A frequent assumption has been that nonnative speech perception can also account for the relative difficulties that late learners have with specific L2 segments and contrasts. However, evaluation of this assumption must take into account the fact that models of nonnative speech perception such as the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM) have focused primarily on naïve listeners, whereas models of L2 speech acquisition such as the Speech Learning Model (SLM) have focused on experienced listeners. This chapter probes the assumption that L2 perceptual learning is determined by nonnative speech perception principles, by considering the commonalities and complementarities between inexperienced listeners and those learning an L2, as viewed from PAM and SLM. Among the issues examined are how language learning may affect perception of phonetic vs. phonological information, how monolingual vs. multiple language experience may impact perception, and what these may imply for attunement of speech perception to changes in the listener’s language environment.
|
|
Keyword:
-; auditory perception; Perpetual Assimilation Model (PAM); phonetics; second language acquisition; speech perception
|
|
URL: http://ezproxy.uws.edu.au/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/sydney/docDetail.action?docID=10161052 http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/511386
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
90 |
Do we need algebraic-like computations? : a reply to Bonatti, Pena, Nespor and Mehler
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
91 |
The delayed trigger voice key : an improved analogue voice key for psycholinguistic research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
92 |
Language tonality and its effects on the perception of contour in short spoken and musical items
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
93 |
Periods of speech perception development and their vestiges in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
94 |
Orthography, phoneme awareness, and the measurement of vocal response times
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
97 |
Resource consumption as a function of topic knowledge in nonnative and native comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|