DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 27

1
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
Hersh, D.; Scarth, L.; Bannister, J.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
Dipper, L.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020
BASE
Show details
4
UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation
Cruice, M.; Botting, N.; Marshall, J.. - : Wiley, 2020
BASE
Show details
5
Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries
Trebilcock, M.; Worrall, L.; Ryan, B.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2019
BASE
Show details
6
Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity
Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, Naomi. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018
BASE
Show details
7
Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia
Cocks, Naomi; Byrne, S.; Pritchard, M.. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018
BASE
Show details
8
Autobiographical memory in aphasia: an exploratory study
Pritchard, M.; Dipper, L.; Salis, C.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia
Cocks, N.; Byrne, S.; Pritchard, M.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
How do speakers with and without aphasia use syntax and semantics across two discourse genres?
Walkden, E.; Dipper, L.; Cruice, M.. - : Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2018
BASE
Show details
11
Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia
Hilari, K.; Galante, L.; Huck, Anneline. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
12
Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity
Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, N.. - : Wiley, 2018
BASE
Show details
13
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia
Pritchard, M.; Hilari, K.; Cocks, Naomi. - : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2017
BASE
Show details
14
Reviewing the Quality of Discourse Information Measures in Aphasia
Abstract: Background: Discourse is fundamental to everyday communication, and is an increasing focus of clinical assessment, intervention, and research. Aphasia can affect the information a speaker communicates in discourse. Little is known about the psychometrics of the tools for measuring information in discourse, which means it is unclear whether these measures are of sufficient quality to be used as clinical outcome measures or diagnostic tools. Aims: The current review aimed to profile the measures used to describe information in aphasic discourse, and assess the quality of these measures against standard psychometric criteria. Methods: A scoping review method was employed. Studies were identified using a systematic search of Scopus, Medline, and Embase databases. Standard psychometric criteria were used to evaluate the measures’ psychometric properties. Main contribution: The current review summarises and collates the information measures used to describe aphasic discourse, and evaluates their quality in terms of the psychometric properties of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Seventy-six studies described 58 discourse information measures, with a mean of 2.28 measures used per study (SD= 1.29, range 1-7). Measures were classified as functional measures (n= 33), which focused on discourse macrostructure, and functional and structural measures (n= 25), which focused on microlinguistic and macrostructural approaches to discourse as described by Armstrong (2000). There were no reports of the acceptability of data generated by the measures (distribution of scores, missing data). Test-retest reliability was reported for just 8/58 measures with 3/8 > 0.80. Intra-rater reliability was reported for 9/58 measures and in all cases % agreement was reported rather than reliability. Percent agreement was also frequently reported for inter-rater reliability, with only 4/76 studies reporting reliability statistics for 12/58 measures; this was generally high (> .80 for 11/12 measures). The majority of measures related clearly to the discourse production model described by Sherratt (2007), indicating content validity. 36/58 measures were used to make 41 comparisons between PWA and NHP, with 31/41 comparisons showing a difference between the groups. Four comparisons were made between genres, with two measures showing a difference between genres, and two measures showing no difference. Conclusions: There is currently insufficient information available to justify the use of discourse information measures as sole diagnostic or outcome measurement tools. Yet the majority of measures are rooted in relevant theory, and there is emerging evidence regarding their psychometric properties. There is significant scope for further psychometric strengthening of discourse information measurement tools.
Keyword: P Language and Literature
URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17105/1/Reviewing%20the%20Quality%20of%20Discourse%20Information%20Measures%20in%20Aphasia%20030216%20FINAL%20TO%20UPLOAD%20.pdf
https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17105/
https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12318
https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17105/6/APPENDIX%20030217%20MP%20FINAL%20TO%20UPLOAD%20.pdf
BASE
Hide details
15
Language and iconic gesture use in procedural discourse by speakers with aphasia
BASE
Show details
16
The language–gesture connection: Evidence from aphasia
BASE
Show details
17
The language-gesture connection: Evidence from aphasia
Morgan, G.; Dipper, L.; Cocks, N.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2015
BASE
Show details
18
Language and Iconic Gesture Use in Procedural Discourse by Speakers with Aphasia
Morgan, G.; Dipper, L.; Pritchard, M.. - : Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015
BASE
Show details
19
The benefits of a 5-day dysphagia intensive placement
Cocks, Naomi; Harding, C.; Pritchard, M.. - : Informa Healthcare, 2014
BASE
Show details
20
The benefits of a 5-day dysphagia intensive placement
Cocks, N.; Harding, C.; Pritchard, M.. - : INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2014
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
27
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern