| 1 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0268-7038 ; EISSN: 1464-5041 ; Aphasiology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03528818 ; Aphasiology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2021, ⟨10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0039-2499 ; EISSN: 1524-4628 ; Stroke ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277820 ; Stroke, American Heart Association, 2021, 52 (5), pp.1778-1787. ⟨10.1161/strokeaha.120.031162⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists.
|
|
|
|
In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Who participates in aphasia research?: an analysis of the REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) data set
|
|
Ali, Myzoon; Elders, Andrew; Godwin, Jon; Karachalia Sandri, Anastasia; Williams, Linda J; Williams, Louise R; VandenBerg, Kathryn; Abel, Stefanie; Abo, Masahiro; Becker, Frank; Bowen, Audrey; Brandenburg, Caitlin; Breitenstein, Caterina; Copland, David; Cranfill, Tamara; Di Pietro-Bachmann, Marie; Enderby, Pam; Fillingham, Joanne; Galli, Federica; Gandolfi, Marialuisa; Glize, Bertrand; Godecke, Erin; Hilari, Katerina; Hinckley, Jacqueline; Horton, Simon; Howard, David; Jaecks, Petra; Jefferies, Beth; Jesus, Luis; Kambanaros, Maria; Khedr, Eman. - : Routledge, 2018
|
|
Abstract:
Background: People with aphasia present with different of demographic, language, stroke, and impairment profiles. A Cochrane review found that two-thirds of included trials had comparison data on participants at baseline (Brady, Kelly, Godwin, Enderby, & Campbell,2016). Participant selection may have a considerable impact on the effective- ness of therapeutic interventions (Hallowell,2008) while participant description is vital to interpretate the clinical relevance to patient subgroup (external validity). Inadequate description of aphasia research participants has been highlighted (Brady et al.,2016; Brookshire,1983; Roberts, Code, & McNeil,2003) as have data collection recommenda- tions and reporting in prospective aphasia research studies. Aim: We examined the reporting of participant descriptors in aphasia research studies from the REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) data set. Methods & Procedures: Two independent researchers accessed data from completed aphasia studies included in the NIHR funded (HS & DR–14/04/22) RELEASE database. We gathered and extracted data using published reports, electronic data sets, and (where possible) unpublished information directly from contributing collaborators (LW, KvB, BB, MB). We examined information on the following participant characteristics– age, sex, time since stroke, lesion and aetiology, aphasia severity, years of education, handedness, cognition, mood, vision, hearing, stroke severity, and co-morbidities. We also considered language of data collection, multi-lingualisim, living context, socio- economic status, dysarthria, and apraxia. We reported frequencies or medians for categorical or continuous factors, respectively, across studies (where such information was available) enabling comparison of the reporting standards recommendations. Outcomes & Results: Data were available from 174 aphasia studies (5932 individual participant data (IPD) conducted across 28 countries and published between 1973 and 2017. Data were derived from 58 case series or cohorts, 43 randomised controlled trials, 68 non-randomised controlled trials, and 5 registries. Severity of stroke in 18/174 = 10% (IPD = 1515) studies and concomitant medical history were only selectively reported (Table 1). We also observed some inconsistencies in the formatting of data reported; for example, in some studies, aphasia severity was reported within severity bandings (mild– moderate–severe) rather than an objective numeric value reflecting performance on a specific language assessment. Conclusions: Heterogeneity continues to be evident in the reporting of demographic and clinical data in aphasia studies. Consistent reporting of key recommended variables in standard formats is required in order to adequately adjust for covariates in analyses, for external validity purposes, for comparisons between studies, and to facilitate future meta-analyses.
|
|
Keyword:
Clinical Neurology; Developmental and Educational Psychology; Language and Linguistics; Linguistics and Language; LPN and LVN; Neurology; Otorhinolaryngology
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:5d14191
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: recovery and functional outcome
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
