| 1 |
The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Voice onset time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 9, No 1 (2018); 11 ; 1868-6354 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Voice Onset Time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Social and phonological dimensions of /l/-‐‑ vocalization in West Australian English (Abstract) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
From Newcastle MOUTH to Aussie ears : Australians' perceptual assimilation and adaptation for Newcastle UK vowels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Perceiving and adapting to regional accent differences among vowel subsystems
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
An evaluation of usage-based approaches to the modelling of sociophonetic variability
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Improvements to vowel categorization in non-native regional accents resulting from multiple- versus single-talker training : a computational approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Effects of short-term exposure to unfamiliar regional accents : Australians’ categorization of London and Yorkshire English consonants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability : probing constraints and capabilities
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability: Probing constraints and capabilities
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This paper presents a systematic comparison of various measures of f0 range in female speakers of English and German. F0 range was analysed along two dimensions, level (i.e. overall f0 height) and span (extent of f0 modulation within a given speech sample). These were examined using two types of measures, one based on 'long-term distributional' (LTD) methods, and the other based on specific landmarks in speech that are linguistic in nature ('linguistic' measures). The various methods were used to identify whether and on what basis or bases speakers of these two languages differ in f0 range. Findings yielded significant cross-language differences in both dimensions of f0 range, but effect sizes were found to be larger for span than for level, and for linguistic than for LTD measures. The linguistic measures also uncovered some differences between the two languages in how f0 range varies through an intonation contour. This helps shed light on the relation between intonational structure and f0 range. ; casl ; Altenberg, E. P., and Ferrand, C. T. (2006). Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English=Russian, and bilingual English- Cantonese young adult women,- J. Voice 20(1), 89-96. Awan, S. N., and Mueller, P. B. (1996). Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of white, African American, and Hispanic kindergartners,- J. Speech. Hear. Res. 39(3), 573-577. Baken, R. J., and Orlikoff, R. F. (2000). Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice, 2nd ed. (Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA). Banse, R., and Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression,- J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70(3), 614-636. Beckman, M., and Ayers Elam, G. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI Labeling, version 3 (Ohio State University, Ohio). Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,- J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57(1), 289-300. Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 4.6) [computer program],- http:==www.praat.org= (Last viewed May 14, 2007). Breen, M., Dilley, L. C., Kraemer, J., and Gibson, E. (2012). Inter-transcriber agreement for two systems of prosodic annotation: ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) and RaP (Rhythm and Pitch),- Corpus Linguist. Linguist. Theory (in press). Brown, A., and Docherty, G. J. (1995). Phonetic variation in dysarthric speech as a function of sampling task,- Eur. J. Disord. Commun. 30(1), 17-35. Chen, S. H. (2005). The effects of tones on speaking frequency and intensity ranges in Mandarin and Min dialects,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(5), 3225-3230. Clark-Carter, D. (1997). Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design to Report (Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex). Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales,- Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37-46. Deutsch, D., Le, J., Shen, J., and Henthorn, T. (2009). The pitch levels of female speech in two Chinese villages,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125(5), EL208-EL213. Diehl, J. J., Watson, D., Bennetto, L., Mcdonough, J., and Gunlogson, C. (2009). An acoustic analysis of prosody in high-functioning autism,- Appl. Psycholinguist. 30(3), 385-404. Dilley, L. C., and Brown, M. (2007). Effects of pitch range variation on f0 extrema in an imitation task,- J. Phonetics 35(4), 523-551. Dolson, M. (1994). The pitch of speech as a function of linguistic community,- Music. Percept. 11(3), 321-331. Eady, S. J. (1982). Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language,- Lang. Speech 25, 29-42. Eckert, H., and Laver, J. (1994). Menschen und ihre Stimmen: Aspekte der vokalen Kommunikation (Humans and their Voices: Aspects of Vocal Communication) (Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim). Escudero, D., Aguilar, L., Vanrell, M. M., and Prieto, P. (2012). Analysis of inter-transcriber consistency in the Cat_ToBI prosodic labelling system,- Speech Communications, retrieved from http:==prosodia.upf. edu=home=arxiu=publicacions=escudero-et-al_analysis-intertranscriberconsistency- cattobi.pdf (Last viewed December 21, 2011). Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. (SAGE Publications, London). Gibbon, D. (1998). German Intonation,- in Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, edited by D. J. Hirst and A. Di Christo (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 78-95. Grabe, E. (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German,- Ph.D. thesis, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Max Planck Institute Series in Psycholinguistics No. 7, Wageningen, Ponsen en Looien. Gussenhoven, C., Repp, B. H., Rietveld, A., Rump, H. H., and Terken, J. (1997). The perceptual prominence of fundamental frequency peaks,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102(5), 3009-3022. Hanley, T. D., Snidecor, J. C., and Ringel, R. L. (1967). Some acoustic differences among languages,- Phonetica 14, 97-107. Hirschberg, J., and Ward, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude, and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise fall rise intonation contour in English,- J. Phonetics 20(2), 241-251. Hollien, H., Hollien, P. A., and de Jong, G. (1997). Effects of three parameters on speaking fundamental frequency,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102(5), 2984-2992. Hubbard, K., and Trauner, D. A. (2007). Intonation and emotion in autistic spectrum disorders,- J. Psycholinguist. Res. 36(2), 159-173. Keating, P., and Kuo, G. (2010). Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin,- UCLA Work. Papers Phonetics 108, 164-187. Kreiman, J., and Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2011). Foundations of Voice Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Voice Production and Perception (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester). Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). Ladd, D. R., Silverman, K. E. A., Tolkmitt, F., Bergmann, G., and Scherer, K. R. (1985). Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78(2), 435-444. Landis, J., and Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,- Biometrics 33(1), 159-174. Liberman, M., and Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length,- in Language Sound Structure, edited by M. Aronoff, R. Oehrle, F. Kelley, and B. W. Stephens (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 157-233. Majewski, W., Hollien, H., and Zalewski, J. (1972). Speaking fundamental frequency of Polish adult males,- Phonetica 25(2), 119-125. Mangold, M., and Grebe, P. (2005). Duden Ausspracheworterbuch (Duden Pronunciation Dictionary), 6th ed. (Dudenverlag, Mannheim). Nishio, M., and Niimi, S. (2008). Changes in speaking fundamental frequency characteristics with aging,- Folia Phoniatr. Logo. 60(3), 120-127. NIST=SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, (2010). http:==www.itl.nist.gov=div898=handbook= (Last viewed October 26, 2010). Patterson, D. (2000). A linguistic approach to pitch range modelling,- Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Pierrehumbert, J. (1979). Perception of fundamental-frequency declination,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66(2), 363-369. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation,- Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Rendall, D., Vokey, J. R., and Nemeth, C. (2007). Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: Biased voice-based impressions of speaker size,- J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33(5), 1208-1219. Sobin, C., and Alpert, M. (1999). Emotion in speech: The acoustic attributes of fear, anger, sadness, and joy,- J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28(4), 347-365. Terken, J. (1994). Fundamental-frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables II: Nonfinal accents,- J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95(6), 3662-3665. 't Hart, J., Collier, R., and Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). Van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women,- Lang. Speech 38, 253-265. Van Dommelen, W. A., and Moxness, B. H. (1995). Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: Sex-specific behaviour,- Lang. Speech 38, 267-287. Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), Vols. 1-3. Yoon, T., Chavarria, S., Cole, J., and Hasegawa, M. (2004). Intertranscriber reliability of prosodic labeling on telephone conversation using ToBI,- Proc. Interspeech 2004, 2729-2732. ; 131 ; pub ; 2622 ; pub ; 3
|
|
URL: http://10.1121/1.3681950
https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2622
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3681950
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12289/2622
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Sound judgements: perception of indexical features in children’s speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Phonological innovation in contemporary spoken British English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
