1 |
The impact of intervention dose form on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The influence of quantitative intervention dosage on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Reflective practice across speech and language therapy and education: a protocol for an integrative review
|
|
|
|
In: HRB Open Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Moving beyond traditional understandings of evidence-based practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to treatment evaluation and clinical decision making in speech-language pathology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The influence of quantitative intervention dosage on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Moving Beyond Traditional Understandings of Evidence-Based Practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to Treatment Evaluation and Clinical Decision Making in Speech-Language Pathology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Consequential differences in perspectives and practices concerning children with developmental language disorders: an integrative review
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Inter‐professional collaboration (IPC) has been recommended for many years as a means by which the needs of children with developmental language disorders (DLD) can be met at school. However, effective IPC remains difficult to achieve and our knowledge of how to support it is limited. A shared understanding between those involved has been identified as critical to IPC. AIMS: To examine the literature, as one source of data, for evidence of a shared understanding between the fields of speech and language therapy (SLT) and education about children with DLD and how such needs can best be met at school. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An integrative review of the literature was undertaken. A systematic search of the published, peer‐reviewed literature (between 2006 and 2016) was conducted for empirical and theoretical papers and a manual search was undertaken to obtain a representative sample of policy/professional guidelines. A total of 81 papers across SLT and education were included in the review. The papers were scrutinized using a qualitative content analysis. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: Although some commonality between perspectives in the literature was identified, differences between the fields dominated. These differences related to how DLD is conceptualized; how children's needs are assessed; which outcomes are prioritized and how best these outcomes can be achieved. We also found differences about what constitutes useful knowledge to guide practice. We suggest that the nature of the differences we identified in the literature may have negative implications for practitioners wishing to collaborate to meet the needs of children with DLD in school. The perspectives of practising SLTs and teachers need to be sought to determine whether the findings from the literature reflect dilemmas in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Effective IPC is essential to meet the needs of children with DLD in school; yet, it remains difficult to achieve. Our review of the literature across SLT and education indicates evidence of a lack of shared understanding about DLD. If these differences are also evident in practice, then a conceptual model to support IPC may be warranted.
|
|
Keyword:
Reviews
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12469 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945410 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767586/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
What our hands tell us: a 2 year follow-up investigating outcomes in subgroups of children with language delay
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
CATALISE : a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Fluidity of language profiles in a follow-up study :is early gesture predictive of later language profile?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Early language delay and later language development: a longitudinal study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Gesture in children with early language delay as a predictor of later language profiles: a follow-up study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Assessment of verb argument structure in children using a story retell task: comparing performance and potential clinical utility from unprompted responses versus graduated prompting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Verb alternations and event structure in children with specific language impairment compared with typically developing children. What can we learn from the story of Cinderella?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Too young for meta? The use of shape coding, rehearsal and comprehension monitoring to treat oral comprehension deficits in a young school age child: a pilot study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Oral language comprehension difficulties in school-aged children: a pilot single case study to investigate the efficacy of a combined intervention approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|