DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3
Hits 1 – 20 of 58

1
A three-stage model for implementing focused written corrective feedback
Chong, Sin Wang. - 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Written Corrective Feedback, Working Memory, and the Development of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of English Plurals ...
Chingchit, Ornuma. - : Lancaster University, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
The Role of Individual Preferences in the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in an English for Academic Purposes Writing Course
In: Australian Journal of Teacher Education (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Assessing Writing in French-as-a-Foreign-Language: Teacher Practices and Learner Uptake
In: Languages; Volume 6; Issue 4; Pages: 210 (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
Can a ‘pedagogical’ spellchecker improve spelling accuracy in L2 Spanish?
Blazquez-Carretero, Miguel; Woore, Robert. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2021. : Center for Language & Technology, 2021. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2021
BASE
Show details
6
Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary English learners’ written syntactic complexity
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 132-150 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning?
In: Issues in Language Studies, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
8
Omani EFL writing instructors’ attitudes and reported and actual practices towards written corrective feedback in first year foundation programmes
Al Zadjali, RSA. - : University of Exeter, 2020. : Education, 2020
Abstract: There is a large body of theoretical research and empirical studies that investigated written corrective feedback. However, this area has been limited to only three empirical studies in higher education institutions in the Omani context (e.g. Al- Bakri, 2015; Al Ajmi, 2015 ; AlBadwawi, 2011) and one at Omani public schools (Al-Harrasi, 2019). The current study is a mixed method study which explores English as a Foreign Language foundation year writing instructors’ practice and attitudes on written corrective feedback at tertiary institutions in the Omani context. The study also examines writing instructors’ actual written response to learners’ essays. Further, it examines whether instructors’ written response is determined by learners’ level of language proficiency in English. In doing so, it aims to provide a deeper understanding of the current views and practices of WCF in the Omani context. For its framework for analysis, the study draws on statistical analysis of an online survey distributed among 174 EFL writing instructors at six higher education institutions in Oman. It also draws on content analysis and quantitative findings of a sample of 96 students’ essays from four different English language proficiency level classes at one higher education institution. The study reveals that the instructors applied unfocused direct written corrective feedback in addition to other types of written corrective feedback. However, content analysis of teacher written response on the sample of 96 written assignments showed that instructors implemented unfocused but indirect written corrective feedback. Further, instructors’ written response to students’ essays was determined by learners’ level of language proficiency in English; beginner students received more direct written corrective feedback while intermediate, upper intermediate and advanced students received metalinguistic written corrective feedback in the form of error codes and grammatical explanation of rules and how to use them in writing. Moreover, instructors’ written commentary on students’ essays focused on grammar and mechanism rather than the content of the essays. In addition, the majority of teacher commentary whether end comments or text-based comments was in the form of evaluative expressions. The study came up with a number of recommendations for policy makers, writing instructors and future researchers. Moreover, I propose a model to maximise teacher written corrective feedback and achieve sustainable feedback.
Keyword: EFL writing instructors; First year Foundation Programme; Omani higher education institutions; written corrective feedback
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/123675
BASE
Hide details
9
An Inquiry into Effective Written Feedback from EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives at a Saudi University
Albogami, M. - : University of Exeter, 2020. : School of Education, 2020
BASE
Show details
10
Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution
BASE
Show details
11
THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING
In: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
12
The Effects of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedbacks on the Business Communication Texts of Technical University Students in Ghana
In: Applied Linguistics Research Journal, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 25-39 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
13
Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations
In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 95-107 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
14
The effects of different types of written corrective feedback on students’ texting mistakes
In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 174-187 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
15
Students’ preferences and teachers’ beliefs towards written corrective feedback
In: ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 85-95 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
16
英語熟達度と筆記による訂正フィードバックが暗示的知識と明示的知識の発達に与える効果
青山, 聡; 髙塚, 成信. - : 兵庫教育大学大学院連合学校教育学研究科, 2019
BASE
Show details
17
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback on KFL Learners’ Writing
An, Hyunjung. - 2019
BASE
Show details
18
The effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving the grammatical accuracy of Omani EFL learners
Al Harrasi, Sharifa Nasser Mohammed. - : University of Stirling, 2019
BASE
Show details
19
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback on French as a second language accuracy
Bouhlal, Fatma. - 2019
BASE
Show details
20
Mediation and Reciprocity: ESL Learner Writing Development through Error Correction
Sobhani, Arezou. - : University of Otago, 2019
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
58
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern