| 1 |
The Yin and Yang of Dictionary Making: Slovenian Lexicographers Reflect
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 31, Pp 159-176 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Normative Labels in Two Lexicographic Traditions: A Slovene–English Case Study
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 30, Pp 561-581 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Focus on the User: Front Matter in Slovenian Dictionaries
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 29, Pp 269-287 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Objectivity, Prescription, Harmlessness, and Drudgery: Reflections of Lexicographers in Slovenia
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 28, Pp 361-383 (2018) (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Approaches to the Treatment of Zero Equivalence in a Bilingual Dictionary
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 27, Pp 522-539 (2017) (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Diasystematic Information in the "Big Five": A Comparison of Print Dictionaries, CD-ROMS/DVD-ROMS and Online Dictionaries
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 25 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Differences in the Inclusion and Treatment of Terminology in OALD3, OALD4 and OALD8
|
|
|
|
In: Lexikos, Vol 23, Pp 440-455 (2013) (2013)
|
|
Abstract:
This article deals with the inclusion and treatment of scientific and technical vocabulary in the third, fourth and eighth editions of Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. The comparison of these editions is based on a random sample of 50 pages from OALD8 from the lemma foot to gimmick. The same lemma range was also studied in OALD3 and OALD4. First, different ways of indicating terminology were identified: i.e., subject-field labels, definitions and short cuts. Then all the lemmata or their senses marked with a subject-field label were found and a list of all subject-field labels used in this lemma range was compiled to see similarities and differences between individual editions. The comparison showed that the number of subject-field labels in all three editions is almost identical, but the subject-field labels differ from edition to edition. The issue of overly specific labels (e.g., 'anatomy', 'phonetics') and labels that are too broad (e.g., 'science', 'technical') is addressed. The next part of the article is devoted to the changes in the treatment of LSP lexical items in these three editions of OALD, from missing labels to changes in labels and ways of indicating terminology by means of definitions and/or short cuts. The conclusion suggests improvements in the subject-field labels themselves, a more consistent way of including subject-field labels even when the definitions indicate the subject field and an improved use of short cuts when the reference is to a certain subject field.
|
|
Keyword:
Africa; definitions; general dictionaries; Germanic languages. Scandinavian languages; Languages and literature of Eastern Asia; lemma; monolingual learner's dictionaries; oald3; oald4; oald8; Oceania; P1-1091; PD1-7159; Philology. Linguistics; PL1-8844; scientific vocabulary; sense indicator; short cuts; subject-field labels; technical vocabulary
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.5788/23-1-1224
https://doaj.org/article/bdfac6c0a4b44dd5bf027c41c0669bf8
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Treatment of multi-word lexical items in the dictionary: the current situation and the potential problems facing dictionary users
|
|
|
|
In: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat, Vol 0, Iss 7, Pp 249-263 (2011) (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
