• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type:
    
    • Article (7)
  • 
    BLLDB-Access:
    • free (7)
    • subject to license (0)

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 7 of 7 1 Acoustic correlates of harmony classes in Somali ... Kimper, Wendell; Wm. G. Bennett; Green, Christopher R.. - : Zenodo, 2019 BASE Show details 2 Acoustic correlates of harmony classes in Somali ... Kimper, Wendell; Wm. G. Bennett; Green, Christopher R.. - : Zenodo, 2019 BASE Show details 3 "Backwards" sibilant palatalization in a variety of Setswana ... Wm. G. Bennett. - : Zenodo, 2019 BASE Show details 4 "Backwards" sibilant palatalization in a variety of Setswana ... Wm. G. Bennett. - : Zenodo, 2019 BASE Show details 5 The productivity of ‘unnatural’ labial palatalization in Xhosa Wm. G. Bennett; Aaron Braver In: Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics, Vol 42, Iss 1 (2016) (2016) BASE Show details 6 Some Interesting Implications of Clicks Wm. G. Bennett In: http://eden.rutgers.edu/~bennettw/papers/Bennett-HUMDRUM2008 handout- Implications of Clicks handout.pdf (2008) Abstract: (1) The overall use of click consonants in natural languages ranges from none at all (in languages like English) to frequent use of a complex inventory of clicks (in many Khoisan languages). However, a cross-linguistic survey1 shows that the distribution of clicks is surprisingly limited. (2) Only a few patterns of distribution occur in natural languages; specifically, clicks are always restricted to onsets, or root-initial onsets. (3) When nasal and non-nasal (=’oral’) clicks have different distributions, nasal clicks are always less restricted than non-nasal clicks. Two observed universals (4) Clicks are never codas (5) Every language with clicks has nasal clicks Two implicational relationships (6) Non-initial clicks imply initial clicks […! ] → [ #! ] 2 (7) Oral clicks imply nasal clicks [ ! ] → [ n!] Aims of this talk (8) Present a phonological explanation for the universals in (4) & (5), and the typologies associated with them, based on airstream features (9) Show how this explanation derives the implicational relationships in (6) & (7) (10) Point out one interesting implication of this proposal: phonetically impossible segments may be outputs of phonology * I am deeply indebted to all the people who got me interested in clicks, and everyone who gave me advice on URL: http://eden.rutgers.edu/~bennettw/papers/Bennett-HUMDRUM2008 handout- Implications of Clicks handout.pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.543.8156 BASE Hide details 7 Reconsidering Nasality in Nasal Clicks Wm. G. Bennett In: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/Events/PLC/plc33/abstracts/Bennett.pdf BASE Show details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 7 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0