1 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the collaboration of aphasia trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2022 to 2026 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0268-7038 ; EISSN: 1464-5041 ; Aphasiology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03528818 ; Aphasiology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2021, ⟨10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0039-2499 ; EISSN: 1524-4628 ; Stroke ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277820 ; Stroke, American Heart Association, 2021, 52 (5), pp.1778-1787. ⟨10.1161/strokeaha.120.031162⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Core outcome set use in aphasia treatment research (Wallace et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed minimum set of outcomes) was developed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in poststroke aphasia treatment research. Successful implementation of a COS requires change in individual and collective research behavior. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand the factors influencing researchers’ use and nonuse of the Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) COS. Method: Aphasia trialists and highly published treatment researchers were identified from the Cochrane review of speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke and through database searches. Participants completed a theory-informed online survey that explored factors influencing COS use. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Results: Sixty-four aphasia researchers from 13 countries participated. Most participants (81%) were aware of the ROMA COS, and participants identified more facilitators than barriers to its ...
|
|
Keyword:
110904 Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases; FOS Clinical medicine; Language
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.23641/asha.16528524 https://asha.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Core_outcome_set_use_in_aphasia_treatment_research_Wallace_et_al_2021_/16528524
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
Core outcome set use in aphasia treatment research (Wallace et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Posttraumatic growth following aphasia: a prospective cohort study of the first year post-stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Many ways of measuring: a scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane evidence-based language test
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
A narrative review of communication accessibility for people with aphasia and implications for multi-disciplinary goal setting after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Prognostication in post‐stroke aphasia: how do speech pathologists formulate and deliver information about recovery?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|