1 |
Desarrollo de la conciencia metalingüística para la comprensión lectora en castellano como segunda lengua ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Desarrollo de la conciencia metalingüística para la comprensión lectora en castellano como segunda lengua ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Comprehension of Yes/No- and Wh-questions Across Autism Spectrum Conditions
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
A study of the differences among EFL/ESL methods for reading Comprehension and language awareness
|
|
|
|
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 35, 2021, pags. 9-24 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Themes in linguistic understanding. Cognition and epistemology
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
In this thesis, I have presented and defended a series of claims regarding the nature and epistemic role of linguistic understanding. Firstly, I have argued that, besides the state- and disposition-sense of “linguistic under- standing,” quite commonly discussed in the philosophical debate, there is yet another, often overlooked, process-sense. I have argued that characterizing linguistic understanding as a process is not only justified from the philosophical point of view (linguistic understanding, just like other processes, unfolds over time) but also is very much in line with the current state of the art in empirical language sciences. Secondly, I have outlined a novel model of the representational structure of linguistic understanding. I have argued that this structure consists of at least three types of interdependent representations generated by a dual-stream process. The model I have offered establishes a middle ground between two popular accounts of the relation between comprehension and acceptance: Cartesian, on which we are free to either accept or reject comprehended information, and Spinozan, on which we automatically accept everything we comprehend. On my account, we automatically accept everything that passes the content-oriented filter (so-called validation ), i.e., everything that is not in obvious tension with our easily accessible background knowledge. Thirdly, I discussed the justification of comprehension-based beliefs, i.e., the beliefs about what other people say. I have argued that this justification is non-inferential, i.e., that it does not depend on the justification of other beliefs, such as the beliefs about what words the speaker uttered or what sounds they produced. Instead of defending the most common version of non-inferentialism about the justification of comprehension-based beliefs, i.e., a view on which these beliefs are prima facie justified by seemings that the speaker said so and so, I have offered a competitive account. On my account, which I call teleological comprehension-process reliabilism : (i) beliefs are prima facie justified if they are produced by a process that has forming true beliefs reliably as a function, and (ii) language comprehension is a process that has forming true comprehension-based beliefs reliably as a function. Fourthly, I have argued that despite what is assumed by many participants in the debate, we are not equipped with a mechanism that allows us to react discriminately to particular instances of untrustworthy testimony, i.e., to prevent the formation of beliefs based on such testimony. However, the fact that all, at least all adult members of our linguistic community are vigilant towards the signs of untrustworthiness, and that liars meet social retribution, brings the long-term benefit of decreasing the number of falsehoods and lies we encounter. This account of the psychosocial mechanisms involved in filtering of the comprehended content provides support for the strong anti-reductionism about testimonial entitlement, i.e., the view that we are prima facie entitled to believe whatever we are being told. Finally, together with the coauthors of Chapter 5: J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon, I have argued that understanding a proposition, commonly identified with linguistic understanding, is a distinct phenomenon. More specifically, it is a type of objectual understanding, which is gradable, consistent with epistemic luck, and based on a subject’s grasping of the coherence-making relation between the elements of a given subject matter. Nevertheless, both linguistic understanding and understanding a proposition play an important role in our everyday communication. In typical cases of successful linguistic communication, we understand communicated thought, i.e., we understand both what proposition has been expressed by the use of a given utterance (linguistic understanding), and this proposition itself.
|
|
Keyword:
81; Ciències Humanes i Socials; Comprehension; Comprensió; Comprensión; Lingüística; Linguistics; Teoria del coneixement; Teoría del conocimiento; Theory of knowledge
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/670332
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
6 |
Comprehension and production of referential expressions across Autism Spectrum Conditions
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
La didáctica de la traducción enfocada en la comprensión del texto ; The didactic of translation focused on the understanding of the text
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
From grammar to reading: a study on referential dependencies
|
|
|
|
In: Bellaterra: journal of teaching and learning language and literature; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2019): Juny/Juliol 2019: Monogràfic; p. 60-77 ; Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2019): Juny/Juliol 2019: Monogràfic; p. 60-77 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
La comprensión sintáctica en la afasia. Una herramienta de evaluación con cláusulas relativas ; Syntactic comprehension in aphasia. An evaluation test with relative clauses
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Fomento de la competencia lectora desde la clase de matemáticas: aplicación práctica para 1º de ESO
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The effect of dynamic assessment on L2 learners’ listening comprehension
|
|
|
|
In: Bellaterra: journal of teaching and learning language and literature; Vol. 11, Núm. 4 (2018); p. 59-70 ; Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature; Vol. 11, Núm. 4 (2018); p. 59-70 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Prosodia y comprensión lectora en Educación Primaria
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Constructor automático de modelos de dominios sin corpus preexistente ; Automatic constructor of domain models without pre-existing corpus
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Efectos de simplificación de textos en la comprensión lectora de las personas con discapacidad intelectual
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Proyecto de intervención para la mejora de la competencia lectora en alumnos de quinto curso de Primaria apoyado en las TIC
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
El papel de la prosodia y el contexto en la comprensión y producción de dos formas de ironía en español
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Analysis of the Effect of Content Familiarity and Gender on English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension by Spanish University Students
|
|
|
|
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 21, 2014, pags. 69-84 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
La enseñanza del inglés como lengua B en la formación de traductores e intérpretes en España : la comprensión oral para la interpretación
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Determining Factors of the Academic Performance on �Listening� of Spanish Students of EFL. Results from the ESLC
|
|
|
|
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 20, 2013, pags. 9-29 (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
O papel da experiência linguística na relação entre alcance de memória de trabalho e compreensão leitora
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|