| 2 |
Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance
|
|
|
|
In: Neuroimage (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention
|
|
|
|
In: Neuroimage (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Spatial selective attention enables listeners to process a signal of interest in natural settings. However, most past studies on auditory spatial attention used impoverished spatial cues: presenting competing sounds to different ears, using only interaural differences in time (ITDs) and/or intensity (IIDs), or using non-individualized head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). Here we tested the hypothesis that impoverished spatial cues impair spatial auditory attention by only weakly engaging relevant cortical networks. Eighteen normal-hearing listeners reported the content of one of two competing syllable streams simulated at roughly +30 ° and −30° azimuth. The competing streams consisted of syllables from two different-sex talkers. Spatialization was based on natural spatial cues (individualized HRTFs), individualized IIDs, or generic ITDs. We measured behavioral performance as well as electroencephalographic markers of selective attention. Behaviorally, subjects recalled target streams most accurately with natural cues. Neurally, spatial attention significantly modulated early evoked sensory response magnitudes only for natural cues, not in conditions using only ITDs or IIDs. Consistent with this, parietal oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-14 Hz; associated with filtering out distracting events from unattended directions) showed significantly less attentional modulation with isolated spatial cues than with natural cues. Our findings support the hypothesis that spatial selective attention networks are only partially engaged by impoverished spatial auditory cues. These results not only suggest that studies using unnatural spatial cues underestimate the neural effects of spatial auditory attention, they also illustrate the importance of preserving natural spatial cues in assistive listening devices to support robust attentional control.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819273/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116151
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493531
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
